Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Courts (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Administrative tribunal (1)
- Ancient Constitutionalism (1)
- Canadian Legal History (1)
-
- Charter (1)
- Counter-Critique (1)
- Criminalization (1)
- Implied Bill Of Rights (1)
- Ivan Rand (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Language (1)
- Law and Policy (1)
- Legal Philosophy (1)
- Mental Health Courts (1)
- Mental Illness (1)
- Mental Illness and Crime (1)
- R v. Conway (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Stigma (1)
- Supreme Court Of Canada (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Too Good To Be True: Second Thoughts On The Proliferation Of Mental Health Counts, H Archibald Kaiser
Too Good To Be True: Second Thoughts On The Proliferation Of Mental Health Counts, H Archibald Kaiser
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The last two decades have witnessed the proliferation of mental health courts, proffered by governments as an efficacious and sometimes exclusive response to the complex social dynamics causing the criminalization of persons who live with mental health problems. the ready embrace of this variant of the problem-solving-courts genre has diverted policy-makers and citizens from confronting the root causes of the challenging intersection of mental illness and crime. the new courts have acquired a legitimacy that belies a wide range of doubts about their existence and operation. this commentary will offer a counterpoint to the accelerating momentum of mental health courts. …
Watch Your Language: A Review Of The Use Of Stigmatizing Language By Canadian Judges, Jocelyn Downie, Michelle Black
Watch Your Language: A Review Of The Use Of Stigmatizing Language By Canadian Judges, Jocelyn Downie, Michelle Black
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Despite ongoing advances in understanding the causes and prevalence of mental health issues, stigmatizing language is still often directed at people who have mental illness. Such language is regularly used by parties, such as the media, who have great influence on public opinion and attitudes. Since the decisions from Canadian courtrooms can also have a strong impact on societal views, we asked whether judges use stigmatizing language in their decisions. To answer this question, we conducted a qualitative study by searching through modern Canadian case law using search terms that were indicative of stigmatizing language. We found that, although judges …
Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism, Jonathon Penney
Ivan Rand's Ancient Constitutionalism, Jonathon Penney
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Few names loom larger than Ivan Rand’s in the history of Canadian law. If anything, Rand has retained his image as a courageous judge willing to bend the law in creative ways to seek justice and protect the rights of oppressed minorities. But Rand’s legal ideas have not faired as well. Over the years, his theory of “implied rights,” and view of the judicial role, has been criticized as incoherent and indefensible. The central aim of this paper is to challenge these criticisms. I want to offer a solution by reconstructing an overlooked component of his legal thought: a form …
Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Charter Remedies: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Steve Coughlan
Tribunal Jurisdiction Over Charter Remedies: Now You See It, Now You Don't, Steve Coughlan
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The Supreme Court's decision in R. v. Conway (reported ante p. 201) simplifies the test for deciding whether an administrative tribunal has jurisdiction to grant Charter remedies. At least in principle, it heralds a broader approach to allowing litigants to seek such remedies at the earlier stage of a proceeding, rather than waiting for a review before a court or pursuing a parallel action. The attitude behind Conway signals a greater willingness to allow administrative tribunals to grant Charter remedies. The test on the key question of whether a tribunal has jurisdiction over a particular remedy is still essentially the …