Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Law And War: Individual Rights, Executive Authority, And Judicial Power In England During World War I, Rachel Vorspan
Law And War: Individual Rights, Executive Authority, And Judicial Power In England During World War I, Rachel Vorspan
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
In this-Article Professor Vorspan examines the role of the English courts during World War I, particularly the judicial response to executive infringements on individual liberty. Focusing on detention, deportation, conscription, and confiscation of property, the Author revises the conventional depiction of the English judiciary during World War I as passive and peripheral. She argues that in four ways the judges were activist and energetic, both in advancing the government's war effort and in promoting their own policies and powers. First, they were judicial warriors, developing innovative legal strategies to legitimize detention and other governmental restrictions on personal freedom. Second, they …
Federal Right Jurisdiction And The Declaratory Remedy, Herman L. Trautman
Federal Right Jurisdiction And The Declaratory Remedy, Herman L. Trautman
Vanderbilt Law Review
Why should we have federal district courts? What should be their primary function? These questions are fundamental to the formulation of a rational basis for the distribution of judicial power between state courts and the trial courts of the federal government.
Our American federal system seeks as a constant objective an appropriate division of governmental power between a national unit, which deals with problems requiring uniform treatment, and state units, which have responsibility for problems depending more upon local conditions. Applying the principle to the federal district courts, it seems clear that their primary function should be to adjudicate federal …
Special Problems In Drafting And Interpreting Procedural Codes And Rules, Charles E. Clark
Special Problems In Drafting And Interpreting Procedural Codes And Rules, Charles E. Clark
Vanderbilt Law Review
My contribution to this symposium will consist of the advancement of one main thesis and four subordinate and supporting ones. My main thesis is simple indeed. Procedural rules must be viewed as grants or creations of judicial power. My subordinate theses then indicate certain complications showing that in practice the matter cannot be thus wholly disposed of. Though too much reform has so assumed, it turns out that telling a court it has power does not guarantee exercise of that power. Judicial inertia, precedent-mindedness, love of technical niceties--all play their part in halting procedural improvement. So does, even more, a …