Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Abusive Pro Se Plaintiffs In The Federal Courts: Proposals For Judicial Control, Michael J. Mueller
Abusive Pro Se Plaintiffs In The Federal Courts: Proposals For Judicial Control, Michael J. Mueller
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note argues that a few courts have adopted lawful restraints and administrative procedures that, if uniformly adopted, would significantly improve protection of judicial resources while preserving access to the civil courts for legitimate claims. Part I identifies career plaintiffs and the burdens imposed on courts by excessive and abusive litigation. Part I also examines the source and scope of the right of access to the judicial process. Part II analyzes judicial responses to abuse in terms of their constitutionality and effectiveness at curbing such tactics. Part III advocates administrative procedures that would promote earlier identification of pro se career …
Introduction: Trends And Developments With Respect To That Amendment 'Central To Enjoyment Of Other Guarantees Of The Bill Of Rights', Yale Kamisar
Articles
Seventy years ago, in the famous Weeks case,' the Supreme Court evoked a storm of controversy by promulgating the federal exclusionary rule. When, a half-century later, in the landmark Mapp case,2 the Court extended the Weeks rule to state criminal proceedings, at least one experienced observer assumed that the controversy "today finds its end." 3 But as we all know now, Mapp only intensified the controversy. Indeed, in recent years spirited debates over proposals to modify the exclusionary rule or to scrap it entirely have filled the air - and the law reviews.'
Is The Section 1983 Civil Rights Statute Overworked? Expanded Use Of Magistrates--An Alternative To Exhaustion, Brian P. Owensby
Is The Section 1983 Civil Rights Statute Overworked? Expanded Use Of Magistrates--An Alternative To Exhaustion, Brian P. Owensby
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Part I of this Note discusses the history and purpose of section 1983 and identifies the danger unmanaged growth of 1983 suits poses to civil rights. Part II examines several judicial responses to the 1983 caseload problem and concludes that congressional action is more appropriate. Parts III and IV explore two areas of possible legislative action. Part III questions the efficacy of a legislatively imposed requirement that the claimant exhaust state administrative remedies as a prerequisite to a 1983 suit in federal court. Part IV proposes an alternative congressional response to the 1983 caseload problem: a carefully tailored use of …