Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Appeal (1)
- Bad faith criticism (1)
- Bailment (1)
- Cases (1)
- City of Cleveland v. United States (1)
-
- Corbin v. City of Cleveland (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Court reports (1)
- Criminal action (1)
- De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. v. United States (1)
- Dignity of the court (1)
- Discipline (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Ford Motor Co. v. Dept. of Treas. of Ind. (1)
- Gemsco Inc. v. Wailing (1)
- Guaranty Trust Company v. York (1)
- History (1)
- Hodes v. Hodes (1)
- Improper (1)
- In re Cocklin's Estate (1)
- Laughlin v. Eicher (1)
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Kelly (1)
- Malinski v. People of State of New York (1)
- Memory (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Michigan Supreme Court (1)
- Michigan Territorial Court (1)
- Misdeeds (1)
- Pamphlet (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Attorney And Client-Criticism Of Court As Ground For Disciplinary Action, Howard Jacobs
Attorney And Client-Criticism Of Court As Ground For Disciplinary Action, Howard Jacobs
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, an attorney, while candidate for nomination to the office of Justice of the Supreme Court of Wyoming, wrote and circulated a pamphlet making false, contemptuous and scandalous charges against the court. He admitted in the pamphlet that he became a candidate for the sole purpose of attacking the court. Held, preparing and circulating such a pamphlet amounted to willful violation of defendant's duties as an attorney of the State of Wyoming, and constituted a legal cause for his suspension from practice for six months. State Board of Law Examiners v. Spriggs, (Wyo. 1945) 155 P. (2d) 285.
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
Contempt-Right Of Court To Dismiss Attorney From Trial-Hardship On Client, John Dobson
Contempt-Right Of Court To Dismiss Attorney From Trial-Hardship On Client, John Dobson
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner asked for a writ of mandamus to have himself reinstated as counsel in a trial. The petitioner had represented two defendants in a criminal action, up until the time the judge presiding in the trial, respondent here, ordered him dismissed from the court as the attorney of record for the defendants. The respondent had called on the various counsel in the case to explain a certain matter, which seemed, "prima facie at least," to show contempt of court. When the petitioner was called on he did not confine himself to the matter in question, but proceeded to attack the …
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
Trial Procedure-Note Taking By Jurors-Misconduct Of Court In Instructing Jury To Take Notes Over Objections Of Litigants, Craig E. Davids S.Ed.
Trial Procedure-Note Taking By Jurors-Misconduct Of Court In Instructing Jury To Take Notes Over Objections Of Litigants, Craig E. Davids S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff suffered injuries by stepping into a hole on the sidewalk of defendant city. After a jury had been impaneled and sworn in the trial of the cause, the court, without the request of either litigant and over their objections, suggested to the jurors that they might take notes on the evidence presented, furnishing them with the necessary materials and instructing them as to how they should be kept during the progress of the trial. The trial court awarded judgment for defendant. The court of appeals, however, reversed the decision of the lower court and granted a new trial, holding …
Unreported Opinions Of The Supreme Court Of Michigan, 1836-1843, William W. Blume
Unreported Opinions Of The Supreme Court Of Michigan, 1836-1843, William W. Blume
Michigan Legal Studies Series
In July 1836 final jurisdiction of non-federal litigation passed from the Michigan Territorial Supreme Court to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. Then, substantially as now, the Constitution provided: "The judicial power shall be vested in one supreme court, and such other courts as the legislature may from time to time establish." Mich. Const. 1835, Art. VI, §1. Those who are interested in the judicial history of Michigan prior to 1836 are fortunate in having access to much of such history contained in the six volumes entitled "Transactions of the Supreme Court of Michigan," edited by Professor William …