Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Saving Civil Justice: Judging Civil Justice, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
No abstract provided.
A Prolonged Slump For ‘Plaintiff-Pitchers’: The Narrow ‘Strike Zone’ For Securities Plaintiffs In The Fourth Circuit, Marc I. Steinberg, Dustin Appel
A Prolonged Slump For ‘Plaintiff-Pitchers’: The Narrow ‘Strike Zone’ For Securities Plaintiffs In The Fourth Circuit, Marc I. Steinberg, Dustin Appel
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This article focuses on the narrow “strike zone” that plaintiffs must overcome in private securities actions instituted in the Fourth Circuit. Based on empirical data generated over a fourteen-year span, there emerges a clear finding that during that time period defendants were victorious in almost all cases, either on the merits of the case or due to procedural obstacles. The authors posit that this pattern of difficulty for plaintiffs arises, at least in part, from the Fourth Circuit’s restrictive interpretation of various requisite elements of these causes of action, such as materiality and scienter, as well as the Fourth Circuit’s …
Law, Facts, And Power, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Law, Facts, And Power, Elizabeth G. Thornburg
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Ashcroft v. Iqbal is wrong in many ways. This essay is about only one of them: the Court’s single-handed return to a pleading system that requires lawyers and judges to distinguish between pleading facts and pleading law. This move not only resuscitates a distinction purposely abandoned by the generation that drafted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but also serves as an example of the very difficulties created by the distinction. The chinks in the law-fact divide are evident in Iqbal itself - both in the already notorious pleading section of the opinion, and in …