Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Merhige (5)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Bork (2)
- History (2)
- Judges (2)
-
- Justices (2)
- Memoriam (2)
- Politics (2)
- Senate (2)
- Adams (1)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (1)
- American electorate (1)
- Annual survey (1)
- Bush (1)
- Candidacy (1)
- Civil justice (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clinton (1)
- Compassion (1)
- Confirmation (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Courts (1)
- Democrat (1)
- District court (1)
- En banc (1)
- Exclusion (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federal court (1)
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
Acknowledgments, R. Kennon Poteat
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remembering Judge Merhige, Michael W. Smith
Remembering Judge Merhige, Michael W. Smith
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr.: A Colleague Remembered, Robert E. Payne
The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr.: A Colleague Remembered, Robert E. Payne
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tribute To Judge Merhige, Orran L. Brown
Tribute To Judge Merhige, Orran L. Brown
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
To Preserve, Protect, And Defend The Constitution Of The United States, Ronald J. Bacigal
To Preserve, Protect, And Defend The Constitution Of The United States, Ronald J. Bacigal
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
Health Courts: Panacea Or Palliative?, Carl W. Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections: The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Gerald L. Baliles
Reflections: The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Gerald L. Baliles
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Panels Affect Judges: Evidence From United States District Courts, Ahmed E. Taha
How Panels Affect Judges: Evidence From United States District Courts, Ahmed E. Taha
University of Richmond Law Review
Recent research has shown that judges on panels decide cases differently than they do individually. Understanding these panel effects is essential to understanding and predicting judicial behavior. This Article uses a unique naturalexperiment, and interviewsof United States district court judges who participatedin this ex-periment, to empirically investigate panel effects. Specifically, in fourteen district courts the judges chose to sit in an en banc panelto decide the constitutionalityof the FederalSentencing Guide- lines; in fifty-three other districts, the judges decided the issue in- dividually instead. This Article compares the decisions and the characteristicsof these districts to study how panels affect judicialdecision making …
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University Of Richmond Law Review Index Volume Xxxix 2004-2005
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Constitutional Right To A Rubber Stamp, Richard J. Durbin
No Constitutional Right To A Rubber Stamp, Richard J. Durbin
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Confirmation Wars: Ideology And The Battle For The Federal Courts, Sheldon Goldman
Judicial Confirmation Wars: Ideology And The Battle For The Federal Courts, Sheldon Goldman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
Federal Judicial Selection: The First Decade, Maeva Marcus
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bork Was The Beginning: Constitutional Moralism And The Politics Of Federal Judicial Selection, Gary L. Mcdowell
Bork Was The Beginning: Constitutional Moralism And The Politics Of Federal Judicial Selection, Gary L. Mcdowell
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Judicial Nominations Wars, William P. Marshall
The Judicial Nominations Wars, William P. Marshall
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Observations On The Status And Impact Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Edith H. Jones
Observations On The Status And Impact Of The Judicial Confirmation Process, Edith H. Jones
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standards Of The Supreme Court, John Cornyn
Standards Of The Supreme Court, John Cornyn
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Debunking Double Standards, John Cornyn
Debunking Double Standards, John Cornyn
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witness, Robert P. Mosteller
Crawford V. Washington: Encouraging And Ensuring The Confrontation Of Witness, Robert P. Mosteller
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.