Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Contracts (4)
- Arbitration and award--Minnesota (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Attorney-client relationship (1)
- Beneficiaries (1)
-
- Business insurance (1)
- Capistrant v. Lifetouch (1)
- Child welfare (1)
- Clauses (Law)--Minnesota (1)
- Construction (1)
- Consumer protection (1)
- Contingency fees (1)
- Copyright (1)
- Entertainment (1)
- Exculpatory contracts (1)
- Film (1)
- Forfeitures (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Homeowner rights (1)
- Horror (1)
- Housing market (1)
- Implied warranty of merchantability (1)
- Insurance policies--Exclusions (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Jason (1)
- Liability waiver (1)
- MnDOT (1)
- Parental waivers (1)
- Parents rights (1)
- Pleading--Minnesota (1)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sign Here: How Parental Waivers Exceed The Bounds Of Parents' Fundamental Rights, Carissa Hansen
Sign Here: How Parental Waivers Exceed The Bounds Of Parents' Fundamental Rights, Carissa Hansen
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Binding Doesn't Really Mean Binding: The Early Decision College Application, Jean Steadman
When Binding Doesn't Really Mean Binding: The Early Decision College Application, Jean Steadman
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Pictured: Minnesota’S Disfavor Toward Forfeitures—Capistrant V. Lifetouch Nat’L Sch. Studios, Inc., 916 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 2018)., Madalyn Elmquist
Not Pictured: Minnesota’S Disfavor Toward Forfeitures—Capistrant V. Lifetouch Nat’L Sch. Studios, Inc., 916 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 2018)., Madalyn Elmquist
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contracts: An Eight-Factor Test For Quantum Meruit Compensation For A Dismissed Contingency Fee Counsel—Faricy Law Firm, P.A. V. Api, Inc. Asbestos Settlement Trust, 912 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. 2018), Mitch Ohiwa
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jason’S Long Night At Camp Blood: Surveying The Independent Copyrightability Of Jason Voorhees In The Wake Of Horror Inc. V. Miller, Tim Kelly
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Bad Foundation: Washington's Lack Of Homeowner Rights, Brendan Williams
Bad Foundation: Washington's Lack Of Homeowner Rights, Brendan Williams
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Contracts: Between A Rock And A Hard Place—Sorchaga V. Ride Auto, Llc, Rachel D. Zaiger
Contracts: Between A Rock And A Hard Place—Sorchaga V. Ride Auto, Llc, Rachel D. Zaiger
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contracts: Mndot's Ironically Nonspecific Specifications Should Not Concern Subcontractors—Storms, Inc. V. Mathy Construction Company, David Ribnick
Contracts: Mndot's Ironically Nonspecific Specifications Should Not Concern Subcontractors—Storms, Inc. V. Mathy Construction Company, David Ribnick
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contracts: A Question Of Consideration: Medical Staff Bylaws As An Enforceable Contract—Medical Staff Of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center V. Avera Marshall, Alexander Hsu
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota, J. David Prince
Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota, J. David Prince
William Mitchell Law Review
Warranty law is an important supplement to tort law principles governing liability for defective products. Warranties arise from promises or assertions associated with either the sale of a product or some other transfer of a product for value. Such promises or assertions about a product may be express, made in the form of the seller’s statements about the qualities or attributes of the product, or they may simply be implied as a matter of policy. Although warranty law is generally regarded today as part of the body of contract law, the origins of warranty lie in tort. Important developments in …
Case Note: Contracts—Into The Void: Minnesota Limits Application Of The Prima Paint Doctrine—Onvoy, Inc. V. Shal, Llc, Mikel D. Johnson
Case Note: Contracts—Into The Void: Minnesota Limits Application Of The Prima Paint Doctrine—Onvoy, Inc. V. Shal, Llc, Mikel D. Johnson
William Mitchell Law Review
This note first gives a brief overview of arbitration use in the United States. It then discusses the Onvoy decision and provides an analysis of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s ruling. Finally, the note concludes that the court’s holding properly weighs Minnesota’s strong presumption in favor of arbitration against the need to allow access to the courts.
Contracts—Beating Them At Their Own Game: The Business Risk Doctrine And The Broadening Coverage Of Commercial General Liability Insurance—Thommes V. Milwaukee Insurance Co., Katherine J. Solon
Contracts—Beating Them At Their Own Game: The Business Risk Doctrine And The Broadening Coverage Of Commercial General Liability Insurance—Thommes V. Milwaukee Insurance Co., Katherine J. Solon
William Mitchell Law Review
This note first examines the theory behind the business risk doctrine in analyzing CGL insurance. It then details the supreme court's holding in Thommes, followed by an analysis of that decision. Finally, the note concludes that, whatever problems may exist, the court has devised a manageable approach to CGL insurance coverage.