Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Animal testing (1)
- Brazilin Blowout (1)
- California (1)
- Consumer protection (1)
- Cosmetic Ingredient Review Panel (1)
-
- Cosmetics (1)
- Debt collection (1)
- Debt collectors (1)
- Debt purchasing (1)
- Edible beauty (1)
- European Union (1)
- FDA (1)
- FDA Cosmetic Safety and Modernization Act (1)
- FDCA (1)
- FDCPA (1)
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (1)
- Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (1)
- Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Henson v. Santander (1)
- Lead (1)
- Lipstick (1)
- Market (1)
- Nanoparticles (1)
- Parabens (1)
- Personal Care Products Safety Act (1)
- Personal care products (1)
- Phthalates (1)
- Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act (1)
- Sunscreen ban (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Beauty Shouldn’T Cause Pain: A Makeover Proposal For The Fda’S Cosmetics Regulation, Lauren Jacobs
Beauty Shouldn’T Cause Pain: A Makeover Proposal For The Fda’S Cosmetics Regulation, Lauren Jacobs
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The American cosmetics industry is not required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct pre-market safety assessments of cosmetics. The FDA only reviews personal care products when people voluntarily report problems. Further, companies continue to test animals for cosmetics, despite the FDA’s recommendation that manufacturers seek more humane and accurate testing. Although the FDA does not require animal testing for product safety or premarket approval, the United States is one of the largest users of laboratory animals for product testing. There are two pending pieces of legislation, which if passed would be the first acts of cosmetic regulation …
The [Un]Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: A Critique Of Henson V. Santander, Monica Paladini
The [Un]Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: A Critique Of Henson V. Santander, Monica Paladini
Pepperdine Law Review
Congress was clear about its purposes and motivations behind enacting the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act of 1977. Namely, it set out to protect consumers from abusive debt collectors and to protect ethical debt collectors from being competitively disadvantaged by those who employ abusive tactics. Although Congress gave much time and effort to crafting the definition of “debt collectors” at the time of the Act’s passage, changes in the debt collection industry over the last four decades have greatly impacted the scope and reach of the FDCPA. Specifically, the advent and rise of debt purchasing have introduced an entirely new …