Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Press-Enterprise Co. V. Superior Court Of California For The County Of Riverside, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Bowsher V. Synar, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Thornburg V. Gingles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Thornburg V. Gingles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Davis V. Bandemer, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Reed V. Campbell, Individually And As Administrix Of The Estate Of Ricker, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Reed V. Campbell, Individually And As Administrix Of The Estate Of Ricker, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Remedies For Underinclusive Statutes: A Critical Appraisal Of Heckler V. Mathews, Bruce K. Miller
Constitutional Remedies For Underinclusive Statutes: A Critical Appraisal Of Heckler V. Mathews, Bruce K. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
The power of the federal courts to remedy injuries caused by constitutional violations is a fundamental assumption of our constitutional scheme. The Supreme Court's equal protection decisions of the past generation illustrate the extent to which we take this power completely for granted. When confronted with a statute that denies a litigant's fifth or fourteenth amendment right to equal treatment, the Court has rarely limited itself to a simple declaration that the statute is unconstitutional. Such declarations, rather, have been routinely accompanied by awards of often substantial relief to the persons injured by the unconstitutional inequality. The author analyzes Heckler …
Whose Rights? What Danger?, Michael E. Tigar
Whose Rights? What Danger?, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And Distributional Voting Rights Controversies, Emily M. Calhoun
The First Amendment And Distributional Voting Rights Controversies, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
Rules And Standards, Pierre Schlag
The Formulaic Constitution, Robert F. Nagel
The Formulaic Constitution, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
The Supreme Court's constitutional jurisprudence of late has been filled with formulae - tests that must be met, hurdles that must be overcome. This multi-pronged analytical technique is, according to Professor Nagel, distancing the Justices from both their audience, the American public, and their text, the Constitution. In an effort to retain the authority of that text, the Court is instead displacing it; in an effort to persuade that audience, the Court is instead excluding it. Furthermore, the Court's attempt to constrain judges has actually created an irresponsible judicial freedom, while its attempt to locate a middle ground between the …
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Rescue Situation, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Pierre Schlag
Framers Intent: The Illegitimate Uses Of History, Pierre Schlag
Framers Intent: The Illegitimate Uses Of History, Pierre Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
Cooperative Federalism Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act: Is This Any Way To Run A Government?, Mark Squillace
Cooperative Federalism Under The Surface Mining Control And Reclamation Act: Is This Any Way To Run A Government?, Mark Squillace
Publications
No abstract provided.
Liberty And Community In Constitutional Law: The Abortion Cases In Comparative Perspective, Donald P. Kommers
Liberty And Community In Constitutional Law: The Abortion Cases In Comparative Perspective, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
In the mid-1970s the high courts of several western democracies handed down constitutional decisions concerning the legal regulation of abortion. All of the courts sustained their abortion statutes except the United States and West Germany, which moved in opposite directions. The US Supreme Court voided the conservative abortion statutes of various states while West Germany's highest court nullified an abortion statute that took a liberal stance on abortion. The extended opinions of the American and German courts and their contrasting grounds for decision make them fitting candidates for a comparative analysis of abortion jurisprudence. The abortion issue illustrates the tension …
Constitutional Law - Moore V. U.S. House Of Representatives: A Possible Expansion Of Congressmen's Standing To Sue, David T. Link, Jeffrey L. Elverman, Thomas E. Lange
Constitutional Law - Moore V. U.S. House Of Representatives: A Possible Expansion Of Congressmen's Standing To Sue, David T. Link, Jeffrey L. Elverman, Thomas E. Lange
Journal Articles
In Moore v. U.S. House of Representatives,I the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit addressed the question of whether individual congressmen have standing to sue the Congress. In Moore, members of the House of Representatives sought declaratory relief to invalidate the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA).2 The congressmen contended that TEFRA originated in the Senate in violation of the origination clause of the United States Constitution, 3 which requires that bills for raising revenue originate in the House of Representatives. Although the District of Columbia Circuit ultimately denied relief on the …