Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Federalism (3)
- Freedom of Speech (2)
- Judicial Process (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
-
- Budget Deficits (1)
- Constitutional History (1)
- Entitlements (1)
- Extraterritoriality (1)
- Federal Jurisdiction (1)
- Freedom of Association (1)
- Gay Rights (1)
- Health Care (1)
- Judgements (1)
- Legislative Power (1)
- Legislative Process (1)
- National Debt (1)
- New York v. United States (505 U.S. 144 (1992)) (1)
- Pleasant Grove City v. Summum (555 U.S. 460 (2009)) (1)
- Public Forum Doctrine (1)
- Religion (1)
- Religious Symbolism (1)
- Same-Sex Marriage (1)
- Self Incrimination (1)
- State Constitutions (1)
- United States (1)
- United States Constitution (1)
- United States Constitution 5th Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
Glenn Beck Bad News For Religious Conservatism, Nathan B. Oman
Glenn Beck Bad News For Religious Conservatism, Nathan B. Oman
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Reconceptualizing The Fifth Amendment Prohibition Of Adverse Comment On Criminal Defendants' Trial Sentence, Jeffrey Bellin
Reconceptualizing The Fifth Amendment Prohibition Of Adverse Comment On Criminal Defendants' Trial Sentence, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
Griffin v. California holds that the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination prohibits a prosecutor from arguing that a defendant’s failure to testify supports an inference of guilt. In the four decades since Griffin was decided, Griffin’s doctrinal underpinnings have been strongly criticized by prominent jurists and commentators, and even Griffin’s contemporary defenders struggle to place the constitutional prohibition of adverse comment on defendant silence within a coherent doctrinal framework.
In light of these largely unanswered criticisms, this Article posits that the current Fifth Amendment-based prohibition of adverse comment is untenable and must be recast in a more narrowly tailored …
Section 8: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Federalism, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Individual Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Individual Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Balanced Budget Amendment Is Dangerous Gimmick, Not Solution, Nathan B. Oman
Balanced Budget Amendment Is Dangerous Gimmick, Not Solution, Nathan B. Oman
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Burying The “Continuing Body” Theory Of The Senate, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Burying The “Continuing Body” Theory Of The Senate, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
In the U.S. Senate, only one-third of the members stand for election every two years; the rest carry over from one congressional term to the next. In this regard the Senate differs from the House of Representatives, where all members stand for election every two-year cycle. That much is familiar, but what legal consequences flow from this structural difference? According to some legislators, courts, and commentators, this difference is very important in that it makes the Senate, but not the House, a "continuing body." The continuing-body idea is invoked to defend highly controversial aspects of Senate practice. By far the …
Poll/Contest: What Shape Is The Constitution?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Poll/Contest: What Shape Is The Constitution?, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Federalism At The Cathedral: Property Rules, Liability Rules, And Inalienability Rules In Tenth Amendment Infrastructure, Erin Ryan
Faculty Publications
This Article explores the consequences for good governance of poorly constructed legal infrastructure in the Tenth Amendment context, and recommends a simple jurisprudential fix: exchanging a property rule for the inalienability remedy rule that the Supreme Court used to protect the anticommandeering entitlement in New York v. United States. Grounded in a values-based theory of American federalism, it shows how the New York inalienability rule unnecessarily removes tools for resolving interjurisdictional quagmires - exemplified by the radioactive waste capacity problem at the heart of the New York litigation - by prohibiting novel forms of state-federal bargaining. In New York, the …
Territoriality And The First Amendment: Free Speech At - And Beyond - Our Borders, Timothy Zick
Territoriality And The First Amendment: Free Speech At - And Beyond - Our Borders, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
How State Supreme Courts Take Consequences Into Account: Toward A State-Centered Understanding Of State Constitutionalism, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Clashing Visions Of A "Living" Constitution: Of Opportunists And Obligationists, William W. Van Alstyne
Clashing Visions Of A "Living" Constitution: Of Opportunists And Obligationists, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court, Social Psychology, And Group Formation, Neal Devins, William Federspiel
The Supreme Court, Social Psychology, And Group Formation, Neal Devins, William Federspiel
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Summum, The Vocality Of Public Places, And The Public Forum, Timothy Zick
Summum, The Vocality Of Public Places, And The Public Forum, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.