Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- Algorithm (1)
- Article 4 and republican government (1)
- Confrontation clause (1)
- Constitutional foundation (1)
-
- Constitutional practice (1)
- Democratic elections (1)
- Electoral College (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Evidentiary problems (1)
- Federal legislative power (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Forensic reports (1)
- History of common law (1)
- Identity federalism (1)
- Jurisdictional conflicts (1)
- Legal Process School (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Marbury v. Madison (1)
- Military power (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Polarization (1)
- Popular sovereignty theory (1)
- Reconstruction (1)
- Risk (1)
- State-based identities (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reconciling Risk And Equality, Christopher Slobogin
Reconciling Risk And Equality, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
States have increasingly resorted to statistically-derived risk algorithms to determine when diversion from prison should occur, whether sentences should be enhanced, and the level of security and treatment a prisoner requires. The federal government has jumped on the bandwagon in a big way with the First Step Act, which mandated that a risk assessment instrument be developed to determine which prisoners can be released early on parole. Policymakers are turning to these algorithms because they are thought to be more accurate and less biased than judges and correctional officials, making them useful tools for reducing prison populations through identification of …
Federalism And The Military Power Of The United States, Robert Leider
Federalism And The Military Power Of The United States, Robert Leider
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article examines the original meaning of the constitutional provisions governing the raising and organization of military forces. It argues that the Framers carefully divided the military between the federal and state governments. This division provided structural checks against the misuse of military power and made it more difficult to use offensive military force. These structural checks have been compromised by the creation of the U.S. Army Reserve, the dual enlistment of National Guard officers and soldiers, and the acceptance of conscription into the national army, all of which have enhanced federal military power beyond its original constitutional limits.
This …
Reconstructing The Congressional Guarantee Of Republican Government, David S. Louk
Reconstructing The Congressional Guarantee Of Republican Government, David S. Louk
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article considers whether the Clause might serve as an additional constitutional basis for federal legislation and explores the interpretive arguments Congress might raise to justify the power to reform electoral processes in the states under the Clause. This Article also questions the prevailing view that the Supreme Court has always treated the Clause as functionally nonjusticiable. It argues that even following established precedents, the contemporary Court might well engage with the merits of legislation and litigation commenced under the Clause, given the Court’s recent penchant for enhanced scrutiny of congressional enforcement powers under the Reconstruction Amendments. Such challenges would …
Identity Federalism In Europe And The United States, Vlad Perju
Identity Federalism In Europe And The United States, Vlad Perju
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The turn to identity is reshaping federalism. Opposition to the policies of the Trump administration, from the travel ban to sanctuary cities and the rollback of environmental protections, has led progressives to explore more fluid and contingent forms of state identity. Conservatives, too, have sought to shift federalism away from the jurisdictional focus on limited and enumerated powers and have argued for a revival of the political safeguards of federalism, including state-based identities. This Article draws on comparative law to study identity as a political safeguard of federalism and its transformation from constitutional discourse to interpretative processes and, eventually, constitutional …
The Constitutional Logic Of The Common Law, Douglas E. Edlin
The Constitutional Logic Of The Common Law, Douglas E. Edlin
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article uses two concepts from philosophical logic, the transitive property and syllogistic reasoning, to examine the history and theory of the common law. More specifically, the Article uses the transitive property to challenge the claims of sovereignty theorists that parliamentary supremacy is truly the most fundamental historical and theoretical basis of the British constitution. Instead, the transitive property helps show that the history and theory of the common law tradition has long provided a role for independent courts in maintaining the rule of law as a foundational principle of the British constitution. The Article then closely analyzes the reasoning …
Putting The Constitution In Its Place, Edward L. Rubin
Putting The Constitution In Its Place, Edward L. Rubin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The fact that Donald Trump became President in 2016, despite losing the popular vote by a substantial margin, has brought renewed attention to the Electoral College system. In "Forging the American Nation," Shlomo Slonim provides an illuminating account of the process that led to this bizarre method of determining the outcome of presidential elections. But Professor Slonim's book also provides insights into the origins of many other structural features of our constitutional system that are of questionable value in a modern democracy, such as elections by state for the Senate, the Senate's exclusive exercise of legislative authority for treaties and …
Unraveling Williams V. Illinois, Edward K. Cheng, Cara C. Mannion
Unraveling Williams V. Illinois, Edward K. Cheng, Cara C. Mannion
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This Essay addresses one of the key evidentiary problems facing courts today: the treatment of forensic reports under the Confrontation Clause. Forensics are a staple of modern criminal trials, yet what restrictions the Confrontation Clause places on forensic reports is entirely unclear. The Supreme Court’s latest decision on the issue, Williams v. Illinois, sowed widespread confusion among lower courts and commentators, and during the 2018 Term, Justices Gorsuch and Kagan dissented to the denial of certiorari in Stuart v. Alabama, a case that would have revisited (and hopefully clarified) Williams.
Our Essay dispels the confusion in Williams v. Illinois. …
Popular Constitutional Argument, Tom Donnelly
Popular Constitutional Argument, Tom Donnelly
Vanderbilt Law Review
Critics have long attacked popular constitutionalists for offering few clues about how their theory might work in practice—-especially inside the courts. These critics are right. Popular constitutionalism—as a matter of both theory and practice—remains a work in progress. In this Article, I take up the challenge of developing an account of (what I call) popular constitutional argument. Briefly stated, popular constitutional argument is a form of argument that draws on the American people’s considered judgments as a source of constitutional authority—akin to traditional sources like text, history, structure, and doctrine. Turning to constitutional theory, I situate popular constitutional argument within …