Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Breaking The Equilibrium: From Distrust Of Representative Government To An Authoritarian Executive, Gábor Attila Tóth
Breaking The Equilibrium: From Distrust Of Representative Government To An Authoritarian Executive, Gábor Attila Tóth
Washington International Law Journal
Although contemporary populist authoritarians have not entirely abandoned the aims and methods of their ancestors, authoritarianism has been undergoing a reinvention in recent years. Behind a façade of constitutionalism, new authoritarianism claims to abide by democratic principles. Populist authoritarians legitimize themselves through popular elections and maintain the entire set of formal institutions associated with constitutional democracy, using them as both an appearance of representation and a tool of authoritarian imposition. The article focuses on the concepts of trust and distrust of representative government to afford a better understanding of populist authoritarianism. The paper describes two rival theoretical conceptions of government, …
Statutory Anti-Constitutionalism, Maciej Bernatt, Michał Ziółkowski
Statutory Anti-Constitutionalism, Maciej Bernatt, Michał Ziółkowski
Washington International Law Journal
The article aims at demonstrating that unconstitutional results, marking an illiberal transformation may be achieved by means of a series of statutory amendments outside the constitutional amendment procedure, when the guardian of the constitution is deactivated. In other words, the evasion of the constitution becomes a means of illiberal change of the legal system. This process is referred to as “statutory anti-constitutionalism.” The article offers a detailed analysis of the legal methods which are used to evade the constitution. These include excessive use of transitional and intertemporal provisions in the statutes, shortening vacatio legis, shortening of constitutionally-determined terms of …
The Resurgence Of Executive Primacy In The Age Of Populism: Introduction To The Symposium, Peter Cane
The Resurgence Of Executive Primacy In The Age Of Populism: Introduction To The Symposium, Peter Cane
Washington International Law Journal
The articles in this issue, devoted to legal and constitutional issues around executive primacy and populism, were first presented at an Advanced Workshop on the Resurgence of Executive Primacy in the Age of Populism, organised by Professor Cheng-Yi Huang and held at the Institutum Jurisprudentiae of the Academica Sinica in Taipei, Taiwan on June 21 and 22, 2018. Scholarly interest in populism has grown over the past thirty years to the point where it could recently be the subject of The Oxford Handbook of Populism, published late in 2017. According to the editors of that volume, the bulk of …
Executive Primacy, Populism, And Public Law, Peter Cane
Executive Primacy, Populism, And Public Law, Peter Cane
Washington International Law Journal
As the articles in this Symposium suggest, populism and authoritarianism present ongoing challenges not only to liberal democracy but also to its legal underpinnings. Manipulation, avoidance, evasion, and outright rejection of the constitutional and legal frameworks of liberal democracy are features of populist authoritarianism. The basic argument of this article is that liberal-democratic public law and legal theory no longer satisfy human needs and desires because they were conceived in worlds that no longer exist, when the main pre-occupation was to secure liberty, not equality. The aim of the article is to explain the inherited structure of our public law …
Implicit Limits On Amending The Japanese Constitution, Adam N. Sterling
Implicit Limits On Amending The Japanese Constitution, Adam N. Sterling
Washington International Law Journal
Japan's Liberal Democratic Party has advocated many years for constitutional revision, and after attaining a two-thirds majority in both Houses of the Diet in 2017, Prime Minister Shinzō Abe is poised to move forward with that goal. The only hurdles to amending the Constitution of Japan are the amendment procedures stipulated in Article 96. The plain text of Article 96 requires a two-thirds vote in both Houses followed by popular referendum, but it poses no explicit limitations on the scope of any amendment even the amendment process itself is fair game at first glance. Nevertheless, Japanese scholars have claimed that …