Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- File Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hobby Lobby's Challenge To Officialdom's 'Compelling Interest', Michael Helfand
Hobby Lobby's Challenge To Officialdom's 'Compelling Interest', Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
The Murkiness Of The Hobby Lobby Ruling, Michael Helfand
The Murkiness Of The Hobby Lobby Ruling, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
America Doesn't See Its Religious Minorities, Michael Helfand
America Doesn't See Its Religious Minorities, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Implied Consent: A Proposal On For-Profit Conscience, Michael Helfand
Implied Consent: A Proposal On For-Profit Conscience, Michael Helfand
Michael A Helfand
No abstract provided.
Beit Din's Gap-Filling Function: Using Beit Din To Protect Your Client, Michael A. Helfand
Beit Din's Gap-Filling Function: Using Beit Din To Protect Your Client, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
This article considers how rabbinical courts play an important gap-filling role by providing parties with a forum to adjudicate a subset of religious disputes that could not be resolved in court. Under current constitutional doctrine, civil courts cannot adjudicate disputes that turn on religious doctrine and practice. By contrast, rabbinical courts can resolve such disputes--and the decisions of rabbinical courts can then be enforced by civil courts even as those same civil courts could not resolve the dispute in the first instance. In this way, rabbinical courts--like other religious arbitration tribunals--fill a void created by constitutional law, ensuring that parties …