Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bioethics and Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutional Law and History (2)
- Rights of Patients (2)
- Abortion (1)
-
- Canadian constitutional law (1)
- Canadian legal history (1)
- Charter of Rights (1)
- Constitutional History (1)
- Constitutional Theory (1)
- Fetus (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- History of Canada (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Notwithstanding Clauses (1)
- Personhood (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
Also appears in The Resolution of Family Conflict: Comparative Legal Perspectives, edited by John M. Eekelaar and Sanford N. Katz, 575-610. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.
'If You Prick Us, Do We Not Bleed?': Of Shylock, Fetuses, And The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
'If You Prick Us, Do We Not Bleed?': Of Shylock, Fetuses, And The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
No abstract provided.
'If You Prick Us, Do We Not Bleed?': Of Shylock, Fetuses, And The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
'If You Prick Us, Do We Not Bleed?': Of Shylock, Fetuses, And The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
No abstract provided.
The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
The focus of the abortion debate in the United States tends to be on whether and at what stage a fetus is a person. I believe this tendency has been unfortunate and counterproductive. Instead of advancing dialogue between opposing sides, such a focus seems to have stunted it, leaving advocates in the sort of “I did not!” – “You did too!” impasse we remember from childhood. Also reminiscent of that childhood scene has been the vain attempt to break the impasse by appeal to a higher authority. Thus, the pro-choice forces hoped they had proved the pro-life forces “wrong” by …
The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery
Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - Override Clauses Under Section 33 - Whether Subject To Judicial Review Under Section 1, Brian Slattery
Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - Override Clauses Under Section 33 - Whether Subject To Judicial Review Under Section 1, Brian Slattery
Brian Slattery
No abstract provided.
Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles H. Baron
Medicine And Human Rights: Emerging Substantive Standards And Procedural Protections For Medical Decision-Making Within The American Family, Charles H. Baron
Charles H. Baron
Also appears in The Resolution of Family Conflict: Comparative Legal Perspectives, edited by John M. Eekelaar and Sanford N. Katz, 575-610. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.
The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery
The Independence Of Canada, Brian Slattery
Brian Slattery