Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Are Mental States Relevant For Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Kent Greenawalt
Are Mental States Relevant For Statutory And Constitutional Interpretation, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
Judges in the United States must interpret statutes and constitutions. Largely because these texts are framed in the English language, a language shared by legislators, judges, and other citizens, judges employ sufficiently common techniques to sustain a coherent practice. Lawyers can often say with some confidence how judges will construe particular legal provisions, and, when they have serious doubts, they can sketch the likely alternatives. But we are now in an era of sharp theoretical disagreement over what judges do when they interpret authoritative texts.
In difficult cases of statutory interpretation, are judges mainly trying to give language its ordinary …