Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 129 S.Ct. 2633 (29) (1)
- 469 U.S. 325 (1985) (1)
- Abortion (1)
- As-applied Challenges (1)
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England (1)
-
- Chief Justice John Roberts (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Facial Challenges (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gonzales v. Carhart (1)
- Health Exception (1)
- Immunity (1)
- Judicial Decision Making (1)
- Judicial Restraint (1)
- New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1)
- Primary School (1)
- Reasonable Suspicion (1)
- Roberts Court (1)
- Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding (1)
- Secondary School (1)
- Strip Search (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Safford Unified School District No. 1 V. Redding, And The Future Of School Strip Searches, Lewis R. Katz
Safford Unified School District No. 1 V. Redding, And The Future Of School Strip Searches, Lewis R. Katz
Faculty Publications
Each year in America an unknown number of children in primary and secondary schools are strip searched by teachers and/or school administrators, forced to remove pants and shirts down to their underwear and sometimes forced to expose their breasts and genitals. In Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding, 129 S.Ct. 2633 (29), the Supreme Court weighed in on the issue, finding that school officials violated the child’s Fourth Amendment rights during a strip search but reversing the Ninth Circuit and awarding the school officials qualified immunity not withstanding the ineptitude of the investigation. The Court purported to apply …
A Radically Immodest Judicial Modesty: The End Of Facial Challenges To Abortion Regulations And The Future Of The Health Exception In The Roberts Era, B. Jessie Hill
Faculty Publications
If there is anything as strongly associated in the public mind with Chief Justice John Roberts as his black robe and judicial temperament, it is surely his claim to judicial modesty. And indeed, some commentators have suggested that there are signs of newfound judicial restraint in the Roberts Court. One example of this purported restraint is the Roberts Court’s expressed preference for narrower, as-applied decisionmaking in constitutional cases, as opposed to striking down statutes on their face. The Roberts Court has turned away facial challenges or otherwise expressed a preference for making decisions on an as-applied basis in a number …