Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (11)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- United States Constitution (5)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (5)
- Due Process of Law (4)
-
- Freedom of Speech (4)
- Federal Courts (3)
- Courts (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Equal Protection (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Federalism (2)
- Freedom of the Press (2)
- Judicial Power (2)
- Judicial Process (2)
- Judicial Review (2)
- Legal Briefs (2)
- National Security (2)
- Property Rights (2)
- Right of Privacy (2)
- United States Constitution 14th Amendment (2)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (2)
- United States Constitution 6th Amendment (2)
- Warrantless Searches (2)
- Wireless Telephones (2)
- (Riley v. California 134 S. Ct. 1126 (2014)) (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Adminsitrative Law (1)
- Advocates (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 48
Full-Text Articles in Law
Warning: Stop-And-Frisk May Be Hazardous To Your Health, Josephine Ross
Warning: Stop-And-Frisk May Be Hazardous To Your Health, Josephine Ross
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Flawed Reasoning Behind Johnson V. United States And A Solution: Why A Facts-Based Approach Should Have Been Used To Interpret The Residual Clause Of The Armed Career Criminal Act, Jake Albert
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Dynamic Relationship Between Freedom Of Speech And Equality, Timothy Zick
The Dynamic Relationship Between Freedom Of Speech And Equality, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
This Article examines the dynamic intersection between freedom of speech and equal protection, with a particular focus on the race and LGBT equality movements. Unlike other works on expression and/or equality, the Article emphasizes the relational and bi-directional connections between freedom of speech and equal protection. Freedom of speech has played a critical role in terms of advancing constitutional equality. However, with regard to both race and LGBT equality, free speech rights also failed in important respects to facilitate equality claims and movements. Advocacy and agitation on behalf of equality rights have also left indelible positive and negative marks on …
The Amicus Machine, Allison Orr Larsen, Neal Devins
The Amicus Machine, Allison Orr Larsen, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court receives a record number of amicus curiae briefs and cites to them with increasing regularity. Amicus briefs have also become influential in determining which cases the Court will hear. It thus becomes important to ask: Where do these briefs come from? The traditional tale describes amicus briefs as the product of interest-group lobbying. But that story is incomplete and outdated. Today, skilled and specialized advocates of the Supreme Court Bar strategize about what issues the Court should hear and from whom they should hear them. They then “wrangle” the necessary amici and “whisper” to coordinate the message. …
Legal Scholarship Highlight: The Amicus Machine, Allison Orr Larsen, Neal Devins
Legal Scholarship Highlight: The Amicus Machine, Allison Orr Larsen, Neal Devins
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Our Prescriptive Judicial Power: Constitutive And Entrenchment Effects Of Historical Practice In Federal Courts Law, Ernest A. Young
Our Prescriptive Judicial Power: Constitutive And Entrenchment Effects Of Historical Practice In Federal Courts Law, Ernest A. Young
William & Mary Law Review
Scholars examining the use of historical practice in constitutional adjudication have focused on a few high-profile separation of powers disputes, such as the recent decisions in NLRB v. Noel Canning and Zivotofsky v. Kerry. This Article argues that “big cases make bad theory”—that the focus on high-profile cases of this type distorts our understanding of how historical practice figures into constitutional adjudication more generally. I shift focus here to the more prosaic terrain of federal courts law, where practice plays a pervasive role. That shift reveals two important insights: First, while historical practice plays an important constitutive role structuring and …
Punishing Sexual Fantasy, Andrew Gilden
Punishing Sexual Fantasy, Andrew Gilden
William & Mary Law Review
The Internet has created unprecedented opportunities for adults and teenagers to explore their sexual identities, but it has also created new ways for the law to monitor and punish a diverse range of taboo sexual communication. A young mother loses custody of her two children due to sexually explicit Facebook conversations. A teenager is prosecuted for child pornography crimes after sending a naked selfie to her teenage boyfriend. An NYPD officer is convicted for conspiracy to kidnap several women based on conversations he had on a “dark fetish” fantasy website. In each of these cases, online sexual exploration and fantasy …
The Most Loved, Most Hated Magazine In America: The Rise And Demise Of Confidential Magazine, Samantha Barbas
The Most Loved, Most Hated Magazine In America: The Rise And Demise Of Confidential Magazine, Samantha Barbas
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Exploiting Ambiguity In The Supreme Court: Cutting Through The Fifth Amendment With Transferable Development Rights, Trevor D. Vincent
Exploiting Ambiguity In The Supreme Court: Cutting Through The Fifth Amendment With Transferable Development Rights, Trevor D. Vincent
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Death Knell For The Death Penalty And The Significance Of Global Realism To Its Abolition From Glossip V. Gross To Brumfield V. Cain, Linda A. Malone
The Death Knell For The Death Penalty And The Significance Of Global Realism To Its Abolition From Glossip V. Gross To Brumfield V. Cain, Linda A. Malone
Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence regarding the death penalty, whether or not cruel, has most certainly been unusual in the annals of criminal punishment. In the short span of four years, the Court foreclosed and then reopened this form of punishment in Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia. One year later the Court would categorically exclude the punishment for the rape of an adult. Five years later the Court would again preclude the punishment, for any defendant convicted of felony-murder who did not participate or share in the homicidal act or intent. In 1986 the Court would struggle with …
Is The “Arising Under” Jurisdictional Grant In Article Iii Self-Executing?, David R. Dow
Is The “Arising Under” Jurisdictional Grant In Article Iii Self-Executing?, David R. Dow
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Real Bite: Legal Realism And Meaningful Rational Basis In Dog Law And Beyond, Ann L. Schiavone
Real Bite: Legal Realism And Meaningful Rational Basis In Dog Law And Beyond, Ann L. Schiavone
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
But First, (Don’T) Let Me Take A Selfie: New Hampshire’S Ban On Ballot Selfies And First Amendment Scrutiny, Emily Wagman
But First, (Don’T) Let Me Take A Selfie: New Hampshire’S Ban On Ballot Selfies And First Amendment Scrutiny, Emily Wagman
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Deconstructing Juryless Fact-Finding In Civil Cases, Shaakirrah R. Sanders
Deconstructing Juryless Fact-Finding In Civil Cases, Shaakirrah R. Sanders
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In many states, legislatures have mandated juryless fact-finding in common law–based civil cases by imposing compensatory damage caps that effectively lessen the jury’s traditional and historic role as injury valuator. The primary purpose of most caps was to reign in “excessive” civil jury verdicts, which allegedly caused “skyrocketing” medical malpractice insurance premiums and litigation costs. But no legislatively imposed cap is triggered by a preliminary finding of excessiveness. Trial judges have no authority to determine whether application of a cap is just or fair to the (often) severely injured plaintiff. Despite a shared interpretive methodology with regards to the nature …
The Lawfulness Of The Same-Sex Marriage Decisions: Charles Black On Obergefell, Toni M. Massaro
The Lawfulness Of The Same-Sex Marriage Decisions: Charles Black On Obergefell, Toni M. Massaro
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Sai, Petitioner V.Transportation Security Administration, Respondent, Patricia E. Roberts, Tillman J. Breckenridge
Sai, Petitioner V.Transportation Security Administration, Respondent, Patricia E. Roberts, Tillman J. Breckenridge
Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Moot Court: Pena-Rodriguez V. Colorado, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court: Pena-Rodriguez V. Colorado, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Criminal, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Criminal, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
'Serial' Should Release Bergdahl Interviews, Jeffrey Bellin
'Serial' Should Release Bergdahl Interviews, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Constitutional Personae, Michael N. Umberger
Book Review Of Constitutional Personae, Michael N. Umberger
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Tiers Of Scrutiny In A Hierarchical Judiciary, Tara Leigh Grove
Tiers Of Scrutiny In A Hierarchical Judiciary, Tara Leigh Grove
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Forging Ahead From Ferguson: Re-Evaluating The Right To Assemble In The Face Of Police Militarization, Ashley M. Eick
Forging Ahead From Ferguson: Re-Evaluating The Right To Assemble In The Face Of Police Militarization, Ashley M. Eick
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Lesser Of Two Evils: Exploring The Constitutionality Of Indefinite Detentions Of Terror Enemy Combatants Following The End Of “Combat Operations” In Afghanistan, Justin A. Thatch
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Due Process As Choice Of Law: A Study In The History Of A Judicial Doctrine, Matthew J. Steilen
Due Process As Choice Of Law: A Study In The History Of A Judicial Doctrine, Matthew J. Steilen
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article argues that procedural due process can be understood as a choice of-law doctrine. Many procedural due process cases require courts to choose between a procedural regime characteristic of the common law—personal notice, oral hearing, neutral judge, and jury trial—and summary procedures employed in administrative agencies.
This way of thinking about procedural due process is at odds with the current balancing test associated with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Mathews v. Eldridge. This Article aims to show, however, that it is consistent with case law over a much longer period, indeed, most of American history. It begins with a …
Confrontation As A Rule Of Production, Pamela R. Metzger
Confrontation As A Rule Of Production, Pamela R. Metzger
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Fissures, Fractures & Doctrinal Drifts: Paying The Price In First Amendment Jurisprudence For A Half Decade Of Avoidance, Minimalism & Partisanship, Clay Calvert, Matthew D. Bunker
Fissures, Fractures & Doctrinal Drifts: Paying The Price In First Amendment Jurisprudence For A Half Decade Of Avoidance, Minimalism & Partisanship, Clay Calvert, Matthew D. Bunker
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article comprehensively examines how the U.S. Supreme Court’s adherence to principles of constitutional avoidance and judicial minimalism, along with partisan rifts among the Justices, have detrimentally affected multiple First Amendment doctrines over the past five years. The doctrines analyzed here include true threats, broadcast indecency, offensive expression, government speech, and strict scrutiny, as well as the fundamental dichotomy between content-based and contentneutral regulations.
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal, Volume 5, William & Mary Law School
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal, Volume 5, William & Mary Law School
Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Journal
Property as a Form of Governance
October 1-2, 2015
Panel 1: Property as a Form of Governance
Panel 3: Of Pipelines, Drilling, & the Use of Eminent Domain
Panel 4: Property Rights in the Digital Age
Implementing Enumeration, Andrew Coan
Implementing Enumeration, Andrew Coan
William & Mary Law Review
The enumeration of legislative powers in Article I of the U.S. Constitution implies that those powers must have limits. This familiar “enumeration principle” has deep roots in American constitutional history and has played a central role in recent federalism decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Courts and commentators, however, have seldom rigorously considered what follows from embracing it. The answer is by no means straightforward. The enumeration principle tells us that federal power must be subject to some limit, but it does not tell us what that limit should be. Nor does it tell us how the Constitution’s commitment to …
Some Thoughts On The Study Of Judicial Behavior, Lee Epstein
Some Thoughts On The Study Of Judicial Behavior, Lee Epstein
William & Mary Law Review
Back in the 1940s the political scientist C. Herman Pritchett began tallying the votes and opinions of Supreme Court Justices. His goal was to use data to test the hypothesis that the Justices were not only following the “law,” but were also motivated by their own ideological preferences.
With the hindsight of nearly eighty years, we know that Pritchett’s seemingly small project helped to create a big field: Judicial Behavior, which I take to be the theoretical and empirical study of the choices judges make. Political scientists continue to play a central role, but they are now joined by economists, …
A Problem Of Standards?: Another Perspective On Secret Law, Jonathan Hafetz
A Problem Of Standards?: Another Perspective On Secret Law, Jonathan Hafetz
William & Mary Law Review
This Article provides a new perspective on the growth of secret law in the United States. It is widely assumed that the U.S. government’s exercise of national security powers suffers from excessive secrecy. Although secrecy presents significant challenges, it does not alone explain the lack of clarity surrounding the government’s legal justifications for using military force, conducting surveillance, or exercising other national security powers. The Article argues that what is often labeled “secret law” may also be understood as a consequence of how legal standards are used in this context.
The Article draws on the larger rules versus standards literature …