Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States v. Wade (2)
- Anatomy of a Trial (1)
- Barber v. Page (1)
- Blackstone (1)
- Bloom v. Illinois (1)
-
- Brady on Bank Checks (1)
- Civil Rights and Responsibilities Under the Constitution (1)
- Crews v. Cloncs (1)
- Crittenden v. Crittenden (1)
- Decisions of the US Supreme Court (1)
- Desist v. United States (1)
- Duncan v. Louisiana (1)
- Escobedo v. Illinois (1)
- Fay v. Noia (1)
- Federal Practice and Procedure (1)
- Franchising (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Gideonv. Wainwright (1)
- Gilbert v. California (1)
- Great Northern Ry. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co. (1)
- Griffen v. California (1)
- Griffin v. Tatum (1)
- Interrogatories and Depositions in Virginia (1)
- Johnson v. New Jersey (1)
- Kaufman v. United States (1)
- Law And Poverty Cases and Materials (1)
- Lawence v. Craven Tire Co. (1)
- Lester v. McFaddon (1)
- Linkletter v. Walker (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.
Right To Court-Appointed Counsel For Misdemeanants In Virginia
Right To Court-Appointed Counsel For Misdemeanants In Virginia
University of Richmond Law Review
The Virginia Constitution makes no specific guarantee of the right to counsel for those charged with a crime as is provided in the federal Constitution, but the Supreme Court of Appeals has declared this to be a fundamental right within the Virginia Bill of Rights. Such right is intended to apply to all persons regardless of their financial status, so if a person charged with a felony proceeds in forma pauperis, it is the duty of the court to appoint counsel to defend him. The right to court-appointed counsel has been extended to persons being questioned concerning a felony, to …
Recent Decisions
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the case law that was decided in 1970.
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
Prospectivity And Retroactivity Of Supreme Court Constitutional Interpretations
University of Richmond Law Review
The freedom of a court, state or federal, to define the limits of ad- herence to precedent has been sanctioned by the Supreme Court in both civil' and criminal cases. Accordingly, any decision can be made to apply to future cases or relate back to all past cases. In no other area of the law is such a decision more important than in the field of criminal procedure where the freedom of a convicted man can rest upon a decision to apply a new "rule" retroactively or prospectively. It is not surprising, therefore, that the majority of retroactivity cases involve …