Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Academic freedom (1)
- Class Action Fairness Act (1)
- Colorado (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Congress (1)
-
- Constitutionality (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crawford v. Washington (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Cross-examination (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (1)
- Detention (1)
- Double jeopardy (1)
- Establishment clause (Constitutional law); Free exercise clause (Constitutional law) (1)
- Evidence law (1)
- Ex post facto clause (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal jurisdiction (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Franz Neumann (1)
- Freedom of association (1)
- Guantanamo (1)
- Habitual offender laws (1)
- Hamdan (1)
- Hamdi (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Judicial power (1)
- Korematsu (1)
- Law schools (1)
- Legislative power (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Juridical Structure Of Habitual Offender Laws And The Jurisprudence Of Authoritarian Social Control, Ahmed A. White
The Juridical Structure Of Habitual Offender Laws And The Jurisprudence Of Authoritarian Social Control, Ahmed A. White
Publications
No abstract provided.
Raising The Red Flag: The Continued Relevance Of The Japanese Internment In The Post-Hamdi World, Aya Gruber
Raising The Red Flag: The Continued Relevance Of The Japanese Internment In The Post-Hamdi World, Aya Gruber
Publications
In the years since the terrorist attacks of September 11th, the Japanese interment has re-emerged as a topic of serious discourse among legal scholars, politicians, civil libertarians, and society in general. Current national security policies have created concerns that the government has stepped dangerously close to the line crossed by the Roosevelt administration during World War II. Civil libertarians invoke the internment to caution policy-makers against two of the most serious dangers of repressive national security policies: racial decision-making and incarceration without process. Bush defenders advance several arguments in response to internment comparisons. The most conservative is an ardent defense …
Crawford At Two: Testimonial Hearsay And The Confrontation Clause, H. Patrick Furman
Crawford At Two: Testimonial Hearsay And The Confrontation Clause, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
This article addresses the response of Colorado courts, and that of certain other jurisdictions, to the 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington.
Reshaping Federal Jurisdiction: Congress's Latest Challenge To Judicial Review, Helen Norton
Reshaping Federal Jurisdiction: Congress's Latest Challenge To Judicial Review, Helen Norton
Publications
This Article examines growing congressional interest in a specific legislative check on judicial power: controlling the types of cases judges are empowered to decide by expanding and/or contracting federal subject matter jurisdiction. Congress has recently sought to shape judicial power through a range of proposals that variously enlarge and compress federal subject matter jurisdiction. In 2004, for example, the House of Representatives voted to strip federal courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act and the Pledge of the Allegiance. Just a few months later, the new 109th Congress undertook a groundbreaking expansion of federal subject …
Academic Freedom: Disciplinary Lessons From Hogwarts, Emily M. Calhoun
Academic Freedom: Disciplinary Lessons From Hogwarts, Emily M. Calhoun
Publications
No abstract provided.
Permissive Discrimination And The Decline Of Religion Clause Jurisprudence: The Wearing Out Of The Joints, Karl Schock
Permissive Discrimination And The Decline Of Religion Clause Jurisprudence: The Wearing Out Of The Joints, Karl Schock
University of Colorado Law Review
This article argues that modern Supreme Court decisions relating to the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause have caused both clauses to lose their constitutional force. Although the Court has long recognized a "play in the joints" between the clauses, it had previously resolved this problem exclusively in favor of the Establishment Clause through its well-established doctrine of permissive accommodation. However, the Court's recent decision in Locke v. Davey suggests that the Court is now willing to allow the overlap between the two clauses to pull in the opposite direction as well. This article explains that the Court's decision …