Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federalism (2)
- Article II (1)
- Constitutional Design (1)
- Constitutional change (1)
- Contestation (1)
-
- Emergency Power (1)
- Executive Power (1)
- Executive Prerogative (1)
- Locke (1)
- Madison (1)
- Prerogative (1)
- Presidential Power (1)
- Royal Prerogative (1)
- Security by discretion (1)
- Security by law (1)
- State constitutional law (1)
- State of Exception (1)
- Supreme Court of the United State (1)
- Youngstown (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Theory And Practice Of Contestatory Federalism, James A. Gardner
The Theory And Practice Of Contestatory Federalism, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
Madisonian theory holds that a federal division of power is necessary to the protection of liberty, but that federalism is a naturally unstable form of government organization that is in constant danger of collapsing into either unitarism or fragmentation. Despite its inherent instability, this condition may be permanently maintained, according to Madison, through a constitutional design that keeps the system in equipoise by institutionalizing a form of perpetual contestation between national and subnational governments. The theory, however, does not specify how that contestation actually occurs, and by what means.
This paper investigates Madison’s hypothesis by documenting the methods actually deployed …
The Security Court, Matthew J. Steilen
The Security Court, Matthew J. Steilen
Journal Articles
The Supreme Court is concerned not only with the limits of our government’s power to protect us, but also with how it protects us. Government can protect us by passing laws that grant powers to its agencies or by conferring discretion on the officers in those agencies. Security by law is preferable to the extent that it promotes rule of law values—certainty, predictability, uniformity, and so on—but, security by discretion is preferable to the extent that it gives government the room it needs to meet threats in whatever form they present themselves. Drawing a line between security by law and …
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
Active Judicial Governance, James A. Gardner
Journal Articles
Evidence marshaled in a new article by Jonathan Marshfield suggests strongly that unlike judges of U.S. federal courts, judges of American state supreme courts both recognize and embrace their role as active participants in the process of indirect popular self-rule. Consequently, they much more willingly serve as active and self-conscious vectors of governance. This is not to say that state judges lack appropriate judicial humility; it is to say merely that they possess a different and more nuanced understanding of the role of courts in American government than some of their federal counterparts.
Unusual: The Death Penalty For Inadvertent Killing, Guyora Binder, Brenner Fissell, Robert Weisberg
Unusual: The Death Penalty For Inadvertent Killing, Guyora Binder, Brenner Fissell, Robert Weisberg
Journal Articles
Can a burglar who frightens the occupant of a house, causing a fatal heart attack, be executed? More generally, does the Eighth Amendment permit capital punishment of one who causes death inadvertently? This scenario is possible in the significant minority of American jurisdictions that permit capital punishment for felony murder without requiring a mental state of intent to kill or reckless indifference to human life. Thus far, Eighth Amendment death penalty jurisprudence has required a culpable mental state of recklessness for execution of accomplices in a fatal felony, but has not yet addressed the culpability required for execution of the …
Francesco Palermo & Karl Kössler's Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements And Case Law (Book Review), James A. Gardner
Francesco Palermo & Karl Kössler's Comparative Federalism: Constitutional Arrangements And Case Law (Book Review), James A. Gardner
Book Reviews
No abstract provided.
How To Think Constitutionally About Prerogative: A Study Of Early American Usage, Matthew J. Steilen
How To Think Constitutionally About Prerogative: A Study Of Early American Usage, Matthew J. Steilen
Journal Articles
This Article challenges the view of “prerogative” as a discretionary authority to act outside the law. For seventy years, political scientists, lawyers and judges have drawn on John Locke’s account of prerogative in the Second Treatise, using it to read foundational texts in American constitutional law. American writings on prerogative produced between 1760 and 1788 are rarely discussed (excepting The Federalist), though these materials exist in abundance. Based on a study of over 700 of these texts, including pamphlets, broadsides, letters, essays, newspaper items, state papers, and legislative debates, this Article argues that early Americans almost never used “prerogative” as …
Secret Law, Jonathan Manes
Secret Law, Jonathan Manes
Journal Articles
The law cannot be a secret hidden from the public. This proposition strikes most of us as uncontroversial—a basic premise of any legal order committed to democratic accountability and the rule of law. Yet in this country secret law not only exists, but has become an entrenched feature of contemporary national security governance. From NSA surveillance to terrorist watch lists to targeted killings, the most controversial national security programs of our time have all been governed by secret rules, secret directives, and secret legal interpretations.
This Article sheds new light on this deeply unsettling state of affairs. It pushes beyond …