Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Board of Immigration Appeals (2)
- American Samoa (1)
- American Samoans (1)
- BIA (1)
- Birthright Citizenship (1)
-
- Bundle-of-Sticks (1)
- Citizenship Clause (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional Rights (1)
- Constitutional Theory (1)
- DHS (1)
- Department of Homeland Security (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Global Political Morality (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Immigrants (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration Courts (1)
- International Law (1)
- John Fitisemanu (1)
- Judicial Review (1)
- Michael Perry (1)
- New Private Law (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Private Law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Escaping Circularity: The Fourth Amendment And Property Law, João Marinotti
Escaping Circularity: The Fourth Amendment And Property Law, João Marinotti
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The Supreme Court’s “reasonable expectation of privacy” test under the Fourth Amendment has often been criticized as circular, and hence subjective and unpredictable. The Court is presumed to base its decisions on society’s expectations of privacy, while society’s expectations of privacy are themselves presumed to be based on the Court’s judgements. As a solution to this problem, property law has been repeatedly propounded as an allegedly independent, autonomous area of law from which the Supreme Court can glean reasonable expectations of privacy without falling back into tautological reasoning.
Such an approach presupposes that property law is not itself circular. If …
The Immigrant Struggle For Effective Counsel: An Empirical Assessment, Jayanth K. Krishnan
The Immigrant Struggle For Effective Counsel: An Empirical Assessment, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Recently, in Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, the Supreme Court upheld 8 U.S.C. § 1252(e)(2), a statutory provision placing restrictions on certain noncitizens from seeking habeas review in the federal judiciary. The Court focused on the Constitution’s Suspension Clause, but it also discussed the Due Process Clause, declaring that there was no violation there either.
One question which flows from this decision is whether the federal courts will soon be precluded from hearing other types of claims brought by noncitizens. Consider ineffective assistance of counsel petitions, which in the immigration law context are rooted in the Due Process Clause. …
The 'Impractical And Anomalous' Consequences Of Territorial Inequity, Jayanth K. Krishnan
The 'Impractical And Anomalous' Consequences Of Territorial Inequity, Jayanth K. Krishnan
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Located in the South Pacific Ocean, American Samoa is one of five populated “unincorporated territories” of the United States. It is unique, though, as those born there are not recognized as American citizens at birth and instead are deemed “noncitizen U.S. nationals.” They enjoy some, but not all, constitutional protections. Two federal appellate courts—the D.C. Circuit (in 2015) and the Tenth Circuit (in 2021)—have ruled that this classification does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. Both courts have stated that it would be “impractical” and “anomalous” to extend birthright citizenship to the American Samoan community.
Drawing upon a powerful …
Human Rights, Constitutional Rights, And Judicial Review: Comparing And Assessing Michael Perry's Early And Contemporary Arguments, Daniel O. Conkle
Human Rights, Constitutional Rights, And Judicial Review: Comparing And Assessing Michael Perry's Early And Contemporary Arguments, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
In this Essay, I explore, compare, and evaluate two theoretical models of judicial review in individual rights cases, each proposed by Professor Michael J. Perry, albeit in books separated by three and a half decades. In his 1982 book, The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary, Early Perry embraced an aggressive form of judicial activism, urging the Supreme Court to test political judgments through an open-ended search for political-moral truth. Contemporary Perry, by contrast, takes a very different approach. In his 2017 book, A Global Political Morality: Human Rights, …