Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (11)
- Environmental law (7)
- Environmental Law (6)
- Human rights (4)
- Environmental constitutionalism (3)
-
- Environmental rights (3)
- U.S. Constitutional Law (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Constitutions (2)
- Dignity (2)
- Pennsylvania (2)
- Comparative Constitutional Law and Transitional Justice (1)
- Comparative law (1)
- Constitutional interpretation (1)
- Delaware (1)
- Energy (1)
- Fracking (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Governance (1)
- Health care (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Latin America (1)
- Public employees (1)
- Robert Lipkin (1)
- Speech (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Sustainability (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Comparative Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May
Comparative Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May
Erin Daly
As more and more countries around the globe are amending their constitutions to recognises environmental rights and duties relating to air, water, the use of natural resources, sustainability, climate change, and more, courts are increasingly engaging with these provisions and developing a common constitutional law of environmental rights. This article examines this growing jurisprudence and surveys the central axes around which debates about environmental constitutionalism revolve. First, we examine whether environmental rights are more suitably advanced at the international level or at the national level of constitutional law, as is increasingly the case; the former offers two alternatives—protecting the environment …
Robinson Township: A Model For Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May
Robinson Township: A Model For Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May
Erin Daly
In Robinson Township v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, a plurality of the court held that a controversial law encouraging fracking (“Act 13”) violates the state’s constitutional Environmental Rights Amendment, the provisions of which the court held are “on par” with political rights. The decision highlights the challenges of engaging constitutional environmental provisions but demonstrates that, with sufficient creativity and commitment, meeting these challenges lies well within the bounds of judicial capability and authority. Because courts around the world are increasingly being asked to engage in environmental constitutionalism, and Robinson Township's thorough examination of the issues is instructive, not only for cases …
Constitutional Environmental Rights, Erin Daly, James R. May
Constitutional Environmental Rights, Erin Daly, James R. May
Erin Daly
Ten Good Practices In Environmental Constitutionalism: Structure, Text And Justiciability, James May, Erin Daly
Ten Good Practices In Environmental Constitutionalism: Structure, Text And Justiciability, James May, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
Environmental constitutionalism is a relatively recent phenomenon at the confluence of constitutional law, international law, human rights, and environmental law. It embodies the recognition that the environment is a proper subject for protection in constitutional texts and for vindication by constitutional courts worldwide. This White Paper posits ten “good practices” – those attributes that make effective outcomes more likely, but not assured – in environmental constitutionalism for advancing positive environmental outcomes considering energy, and governance and sustainability. Good practices in environmental constitutionalism can serve as a useful construct for considering the relationship between sustainability, energy and governance. Accordingly, Section A …
Health-Care Law Puts Supreme Court Atop A Slippery Slope, Erin Daly
Health-Care Law Puts Supreme Court Atop A Slippery Slope, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
Constitutional Protection For Environmental Rights: The Benefits Of Environmental Process, Erin Daly
Constitutional Protection For Environmental Rights: The Benefits Of Environmental Process, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
More and more constitutions around the world -- from Bangladesh to Bolivia, and from the Philippines to the countries of the EU -- are explicitly protecting environmental rights and the values of a clean and healthy environment. In many instances, environmental rights are recognized not as substantive entitlements (which would allow litigants to sue if the government polluted their rivers or clearcut their forests), but as procedural rights. Examples of procedural rights include imposing on governments the obligation to consult with communities before they take actions that will affect their environment or giving individuals the right to participate in governmental …
Constitutional Environmental Rights Worldwide, James May, Erin Daly
Constitutional Environmental Rights Worldwide, James May, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
No abstract provided.
New Directions In Earth Rights, Environmental Rights And Human Rights: Six Facets Of Constitutionally Embedded Environmental Rights Worldwide, James May, Erin Daly
New Directions In Earth Rights, Environmental Rights And Human Rights: Six Facets Of Constitutionally Embedded Environmental Rights Worldwide, James May, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
This essay provides an overview of the worldwide phenomenon of constitutional environmental rights. Since the Stockholm Convention, nearly 60 countries have constitutionally entrenched environmental rights, according their citizens basic rights to environmental quality in one form or another. The list is diverse politically, including countries with civil, common law, Islamic, and other traditions. Some of the more recent of these include Kenya in 2010, Ecuador in 2007, France in 2005, Afghanistan in 2004, and South Africa in 1996. As a result, domestic courts and international tribunals are enforcing constitutionally enshrined environmental rights with growing frequency, reflecting basic human rights to …
Foreword - In Memory Of Robert J. Lipkin, James May, Erin Daly, Robert Hayman
Foreword - In Memory Of Robert J. Lipkin, James May, Erin Daly, Robert Hayman
Erin Daly
This is a foreword to a compendium of writings by our lost friend and colleague, Bobby Lipkin, collected within a special issue of the Widener Law Review. Bobby’s constitutionalism beholds and celebrates that "no constitutional truths emanate from either politically unaccountable" courts or from paradigmatically imperfect constitutional legal theories. Rather, Bobby’s constitutionalism was participatory and justificatory: it derives from the Constitution’s republican democracy. The Constitution means what We the People allow it to mean at constitutional inflection points in our nation’s history. We miss Bobby dearly.
Dignity In The Service Of Democracy, Erin Daly
Dignity In The Service Of Democracy, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
At a broad level, perhaps the most noticeable trend in Latin American constitutional law is the increasing muscularity of constitutional tribunals. Throughout the region, particularly in South America, tribunals charged with interpreting their country’s constitution are increasingly asserting themselves and inserting themselves into public controversies, from abortion to same sex marriage to the rights of political association. This heightened judicial activity can come at a cost to democracy: typically, the more social issues are decided by unelected and unaccountable judges rather than through a political process, the less the people control the resolution of those issues. The more outcomes are …
Human Dignity In The Roberts Court: A Story Of Inchoate Institutions, Autonomous Individuals, And The Reluctant Recognition Of A Right, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has assumed that dignity is relevant to constitutional interpretation, though it has rarely considered exactly how. In the post-war years, the Court (like its counterparts around the world) found that human dignity underlay many individual rights, and in the 1990s, the Court's federalism jurisprudence found that the dignity of states immunized them from most lawsuits in both state and federal courts. This article examines the Court's past references to dignity and argues that the conception of dignity that is evoked in the federalism cases -- which focus, at root, on the autonomy of the …
Garcetti In Delaware: New Limits On Public Employees' Speech, Erin Daly
Garcetti In Delaware: New Limits On Public Employees' Speech, Erin Daly
Erin Daly
In 2006, the Supreme Court decided Garcetti v Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), which significantly altered the free speech rights of the more than 18 million Americans who are public employees for federal, state or local government. It revised the test it had formerly used for public employee speech and, in so doing, dramatically diminished the scope of their rights. This has significant implications not only for the individuals involved, but for the public at large, and for the praxis of democracy in America: by limiting what public employees can say about their workplaces, the Court has reduced the amount …