Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Conflict of Laws

PDF

Vanderbilt Law Review

1954

Conflict of laws

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Conflict Of Laws -- 1954 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade Aug 1954

Conflict Of Laws -- 1954 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

There are three Tennessee Supreme Court cases involving Conflict of Laws and an equal number of federal cases arising in Tennessee. One of the state cases raises constitutional questions and the United States Supreme Court may someday disagree with the Tennessee court.

"Stockholders' Liability." This case is Paper Products Co. v. Doggrell. The facts are not complicated, but a rather involved mix-up developed between the state and federal courts.

Doggrell, Konz and Whitaker were sole stockholders in an Arkansas business association entitled Forest City Wood Products, Inc., with principal office located in St. Francis County, Arkansas. Doggrell and Konz were …


Recent Cases, Law Review Staff Feb 1954

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Conflict of Laws--Full Faith and Credit--Characterization of Statute as Penal

Federal Tort Claims Act--Exceptions--Intentional Torts

Federal Tort Claims Act--Indemnity--Employee's Liability to Government

Federal Tort Claims Act--Parties--Impleader and Joinder

Gift Tax--Valuation--Sale or Replacement Value

Life Insurance--War Clause--Korean Conflict

Tennessee Procedure--Right to Jury Trial in Chancery--Purely Equitable Suit

Trade-Marks--Infringement as Unfair Competition--Application of Lanham Act


State Law Versus A Federal Common Law Of Torts, Irvin M. Gottlieb Feb 1954

State Law Versus A Federal Common Law Of Torts, Irvin M. Gottlieb

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Statute, Its Scope and Basic Standard Section 421(k) of the Federal Tort Claims Act excludes from its coverage "any claim arising in a foreign country."' The Foreign Claims Act which was passed by the 77th Congress and amended by the 78th Congress has specific application to foreign countries, including places located therein which are under the temporary or permanent jurisdiction of the United States.

Court test of the territorial scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act arose in a series of cases decided in 1948, culminating in United States v. Spelar, where the issue of possible foreign coverage was …