Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- FCC (3)
- Net neutrality (3)
- Communications Law (2)
- Telecommunications (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Comcast (1)
- Communications (1)
- Executive agencies (1)
- Executive agency (1)
- FTC (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Independent agencies (1)
- Independent agency (1)
- Interconnection (1)
- Open Internet (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Section 706 (1)
- Title 2 (1)
- Title II (1)
- Verizon (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federal And State Authority For Broadband Regulation, Tejas N. Narechania
Federal And State Authority For Broadband Regulation, Tejas N. Narechania
Tejas N. Narechania
Verizon’s challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s 2010 Open Internet Order voided the substance of those rules. But even as the Commission lost the authority to enforce those rules, it gained substantial new regulatory powers. The D.C. Circuit expressly affirmed the Commission’s interpretation of section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, granting it general regulatory authority to promote the deployment of broadband infrastructure. The significance of this power can hardly be understated. The Commission has relied on this authority to preempt state statutes, to subsidize broadband deployment, and even to support, together with Title II of the Communications Act, …
Agency Boundaries And Network Neutrality, Tejas N. Narechania
Agency Boundaries And Network Neutrality, Tejas N. Narechania
Tejas N. Narechania
The Federal Communications Commission’s latest network neutrality regulations, released in 2015, have been the subject of compliment and critique by a varied set of politicians, industry leaders, and scholars. But a potentially surprising font of criticism for these new rules lies within the administration itself: During the FCC’s rule-making proceeding, the Federal Trade Commission cautioned that the FCC could undermine the FTC’s authority to sanction unfair and anticompetitive conduct in broadband industries by activating its powers under Title II of the Communications Act. Simultaneously, members of the FTC argued that it, rather than the FCC, was better suited to address …
Network Nepotism And The Market For Content Delivery, Tejas N. Narechania
Network Nepotism And The Market For Content Delivery, Tejas N. Narechania
Tejas N. Narechania
The Federal Communications Commission has officially launched its third attempt to impose network neutrality rules on Internet traffic. But before the Commission could release its proposed regulations, they leaked to the Wall Street Journal and were quickly embroiled in controversy. Chief among the objections was the possibility that the new regulations would allow broadband carriers, such as Verizon, to prioritize certain traffic, thereby creating an Internet “fast lane” that could be dedicated to select content, websites, or applications. Of particular concern was the possibility that carriers would use this power to accord special treatment to other members of its corporate …
Sender Side Transmission Rules For The Internet, Tejas N. Narechania, Tim Wu
Sender Side Transmission Rules For The Internet, Tejas N. Narechania, Tim Wu
Tejas N. Narechania
In January 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down the FCC's 2010 Open Internet Order, which contained the Commission's net neutrality rules. The Commission has since indicated that it will take up the D.C. Circuit's invitation to implement rules that, consistent with historic practice, meet the court’s test for preventing improper blocking and discrimination of Internet traffic. In this paper, we consider the Commission's options for a path forward under Title II of the Communications Act. We find that the FCC has at least two available paths. The first is predominantly legal: By adopting the …