Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

Binding The Dogs Of War: Japan And The Constitutionalizing Of Jus Ad Bellum, Craig Martin Nov 2008

Binding The Dogs Of War: Japan And The Constitutionalizing Of Jus Ad Bellum, Craig Martin

Craig Martin

There is still very little constitutional control over the decision to use armed force, and very limited domestic implementation of the international principles of jus ad bellum, notwithstanding the increasing overlap between international and domestic legal systems and the spread of constitutional democracy. The relationship between constitutional and international law constraints on the use of armed force has a long history. Aspects of constitutional theory, liberal theories of international law, and transnational process theory of international law compliance, suggest that constitutional design could legitimately be used as a pre-commitment device to lock-in jus ad bellum principles, and thereby enhance compliance …


Free Speech And Holocaust Denial, Russell L. Weaver Oct 2008

Free Speech And Holocaust Denial, Russell L. Weaver

Russell L. Weaver

Even though no reputable historian denies the existence of the Holocaust, or the six million deaths that resulted, Holocaust denial is on the ascendance. The British Broadcasting Company has suggested that Holocaust survivors are aging and dying off, thereby resulting in more efforts to deny that the Holocaust ever really occurred. In addition, the development of the Internet, and the ease with which it can be accessed, has made it easier for Holocaust deniers to communicate with themselves and others. As one commentator noted, “hate has gone high tech. Hatemongers used to meet in dingy basements; now they meet online. …


Divided By A Common Legal Tradition, Intisar Rabb Phd Sep 2008

Divided By A Common Legal Tradition, Intisar Rabb Phd

Intisar A. Rabb

No abstract provided.


Judgments Of The United States Supreme Court And The South African Constitutional Court As A Basis For A Universal Method To Resolve Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Daniel H. Erskine Feb 2008

Judgments Of The United States Supreme Court And The South African Constitutional Court As A Basis For A Universal Method To Resolve Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights, Daniel H. Erskine

Daniel H. Erskine

This article describes the methods utilized by the United States Supreme Court to resolve specific cases involving conflicts between federal constitutional rights, a federal constitutional right and a state constitutional or statutory right, and an international treaty right and a federal constitutional right. Consideration of particular decisions representative of the manner the Court resolves conflicts between rights in the three typologies described above, illustrates how the Court views such conflicts and the rationales employed to resolve apparent conflicting rights. The rationales used by the United States Supreme Court are compared to the South African Constitutional Court’s decisions in the Soobramoney, …


The Trial Of Queen Caroline And The Impeachment Of President Clinton: Law As A Weapon For Political Reform, Daniel H. Erskine Jan 2008

The Trial Of Queen Caroline And The Impeachment Of President Clinton: Law As A Weapon For Political Reform, Daniel H. Erskine

Daniel H. Erskine

This article explores the calculated use of legal mechanisms to impact national politics and the effect such utilization had on accomplishing deliberate political reform. In answering why political actors use legal procedures as political weapons and whether such use is effective, this paper analyzes two historical examples to illustrate that law as political weapon is extremely successful in accomplishing political change. In the early 1800’s, England’s King sought to defrock his politically radical heroine Queen Caroline through the parliamentary mechanism of a Bill of Pains and Penalties, which caused a flourish of public criticism and call for political revolution. Public …


Case Note On Supreme Court Of Cyprus (2007), Toumaian Christodoulidou V. Toumaian (2007) 1 Α.Α.Δ. 1024 [In Greek], Nikitas E. Hatzimihail Jan 2008

Case Note On Supreme Court Of Cyprus (2007), Toumaian Christodoulidou V. Toumaian (2007) 1 Α.Α.Δ. 1024 [In Greek], Nikitas E. Hatzimihail

Nikitas E Hatzimihail

The note makes the statement that the Family Courts of Cyprus have been gradually transformed, from tribunal to court, since their establishment in 1990, by means of the legislative reforms and the evolution of case law in the past two decades. Having been launched as tribunals, in replacement of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction over divorce cases of the Greek Orthodox Community, they presently stand as superior courts of limited jurisdiction (courts of justice), with power and specialization over all matters of family law. As a consequence, ratione personae exceptions to their jurisdiction (notably with regard to members of the three acknowledged …


Invited Comparative Commentary To The 67th Biennial German Jurists Meeting, Thomas Kohler Dec 2007

Invited Comparative Commentary To The 67th Biennial German Jurists Meeting, Thomas Kohler

Thomas C. Kohler

No abstract provided.


Избирательные Системы Стран Ближнего Востока: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy Dec 2007

Избирательные Системы Стран Ближнего Востока: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Electoral systems of Middle East countries are in formation stage. They are under construction on the basis of principles confessionalism (the Lebanese republic), ideologies pan - Arabian generality and «the Arabian socialism» (Arabian Republic Egypt), democratic political mode (State of Israel), influences them the form of government in (Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kingdom Morocco).


Избирательное Право Итальянской Республики И Федеративной Республики Германии: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy Dec 2007

Избирательное Право Итальянской Республики И Федеративной Республики Германии: Сравнительный Анализ, Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

Leonid G. Berlyavskiy

The present article purpose is the comparative analysis of Electoral Law of two European states leading members of the European Union: the Italian Republic and Federal Republic of Germany. Both states have endured the periods of fascist dictatorships, post-war democratisation, have the stable constitutional systems, the developed economy. At the same time, from the point of view of the suffrage, each of them differs essential features