Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Canadian abortion law (1)
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Chicago School of Economics (1)
-
- Corporate regulation (1)
- Corporatisation (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- English Legal Profession (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusionary remedies (1)
- Forest management (1)
- Forest services (1)
- Industry self-regulation (1)
- Lawyers in the European Community (1)
- Megalaw Firms in the U.K. (1)
- Morgentaler v. The Queen (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- Public land management (1)
- Regulatory law (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Megalaw In The U.K.: Professionalism Or Corporatism? A Preliminary Report, John Flood
Megalaw In The U.K.: Professionalism Or Corporatism? A Preliminary Report, John Flood
Indiana Law Journal
The Growth of Large Law Firms and Its Effect on the Legal Profession and Legal Education, Symposium
Corporatisation: Implementing Forest Management Reform In New Zealand, Robert L. Fischman, Richard L. Nagle
Corporatisation: Implementing Forest Management Reform In New Zealand, Robert L. Fischman, Richard L. Nagle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Canada's Roe: The Canadian Abortion Decision And Its Implications For American Constitutional Law And Theory, Daniel O. Conkle
Canada's Roe: The Canadian Abortion Decision And Its Implications For American Constitutional Law And Theory, Daniel O. Conkle
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Enforcing The Rules Of Criminal Procedure: An American Perspective, Craig M. Bradley
Enforcing The Rules Of Criminal Procedure: An American Perspective, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Populist And Economic V. Feudal: Approaches To Industry Self-Regulation In The United States And England, Robert H. Heidt
Populist And Economic V. Feudal: Approaches To Industry Self-Regulation In The United States And England, Robert H. Heidt
Articles by Maurer Faculty
English and American courts treat industry self-regulation very differently. American courts have been generally slow to acknowledge the legitimacy of self-regulation. Once they accept the need for some degree of self-regulation, however, the American courts, under the growing influence of the Chicago school, have become increasingly willing to uphold the regulation on the grounds of economic efficiency. The English courts have had less difficulty recognizing the legitimate role industry self-regulation plays. In determining the reasonableness of the regulatory scheme, however, the English courts adopt a protectionist approach which favours the status quo within the industry. These distinctions, the author argues, …