Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Broadcasting Policy (4)
- Telecommunications Act of 1996 (4)
- Advertising (3)
- Krattenmaker Dean Collection (3)
- United States Federal Communications Commission (3)
-
- Broadcasting (2)
- Federal Communications Commission (2)
- Social media (2)
- Social media--Government policy (2)
- Telecommunications Industy (2)
- Wireless Communications (2)
- Actors (1)
- Administrative Remedies (1)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (408 U.S. 665 (1972)) (1)
- Broadcasting Rights (1)
- Cable Television (1)
- Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (1)
- Communication policy (1)
- Communications (1)
- Communications Act of 1934 (1)
- Confrontation (1)
- Copyright Infringement (1)
- Crawford v. Washington (541 U.S. 36 (2004)) (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Don R. Le Duc (1)
- FCC v. WNCN Listeners Guid (1)
- Fairness Doctrine (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 24 of 24
Full-Text Articles in Law
Killing Two Birds With One Stone: Remedying Malicious Social Bot Behavior Via Section 230 Reform, Jackson Smith
Killing Two Birds With One Stone: Remedying Malicious Social Bot Behavior Via Section 230 Reform, Jackson Smith
William & Mary Business Law Review
As “interactive computer services” (social media sites) expanded over the past decade, so too did the prevalence of “social bots,” software programs that mimic human behavior online. The capacity social bots have to exponentially amplify often-harmful content has led to calls for greater accountability from social media companies in the way they manage bot presence on their sites. In response, many social media companies and private researchers have developed bot-detection methodologies to better govern social bot activities. At the same time, the prevalence of harmful content on social media sites has led to calls to reform Section 230 of the …
Likes, Camera, Action: Safeguarding "Child Influencers" Through Expanded Coogan Protections And Increased Regulation Of Social Media, Dana D. Joss
William & Mary Business Law Review
As a result of the increased popularity of influencer marketing, various “child influencers” have risen to stardom on popular social media platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. To date, these children have no protections under the law to safeguard them from the dangers of the influencer industry. Namely, there are no safeguards from financial exploitation by parents and guardians; children hold no guarantee that they can retain their earnings from social media. Further, there are no regulations in place regarding the number of hours child influencers may work and such children sometimes maintain little control over the extent of …
Abc V. Aereo And The Humble Judge, James Y. Stern
Abc V. Aereo And The Humble Judge, James Y. Stern
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Applying Crawford's Confrontation Right In A Digital Age, Jeffrey Bellin
Applying Crawford's Confrontation Right In A Digital Age, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Needed: More Than A Paper Shield, Sandra Davidson, David Herrera
Needed: More Than A Paper Shield, Sandra Davidson, David Herrera
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Moot Court, Fcc V. Fox Television Stations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court, Fcc V. Fox Television Stations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Fcc V. Wncn Listeners Guild: An Old-Fashioned Remedy For What Ails Current Judicial Review Law, Charles H. Koch Jr.
Fcc V. Wncn Listeners Guild: An Old-Fashioned Remedy For What Ails Current Judicial Review Law, Charles H. Koch Jr.
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Evaluating The Federal Communications Commission's National Television Ownership Cap: What's Bad For Broadcasting Is Good For The Country, Stuart Minor Benjamin
Evaluating The Federal Communications Commission's National Television Ownership Cap: What's Bad For Broadcasting Is Good For The Country, Stuart Minor Benjamin
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Riding On A Diamond In The Sky: The Dbs Set-Aside Provisions Of The 1992 Cable Act, Richard L. Weber
Riding On A Diamond In The Sky: The Dbs Set-Aside Provisions Of The 1992 Cable Act, Richard L. Weber
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wireless Facilities Are A Towering Problem: How Can Local Zoning Boards Make The Call Without Violating Section 704 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996?, Kevin M. O'Neill
Wireless Facilities Are A Towering Problem: How Can Local Zoning Boards Make The Call Without Violating Section 704 Of The Telecommunications Act Of 1996?, Kevin M. O'Neill
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Getting Wireless Carriers Wired For Less: An Argument For Federal Regulation Of Lec-Cmrs Interconnection Agreements, Derek Yeo
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Culture Of Regulation, Rodney A. Smolla
The Culture Of Regulation, Rodney A. Smolla
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
The Telecommunications Act Of 1996, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Responses, Thomas G. Krattenmaker
Joe Camel: Will "Old Joe" Survive?, Erica Swecker
Joe Camel: Will "Old Joe" Survive?, Erica Swecker
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Converging First Amendment Principles For Converging Communications Media, Thomas G. Krattenmaker, L. A. Powe Jr.
Converging First Amendment Principles For Converging Communications Media, Thomas G. Krattenmaker, L. A. Powe Jr.
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Congress, The Fcc, And The Search For The Public Trustee, Neal Devins
Congress, The Fcc, And The Search For The Public Trustee, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Obscenity In The Age Of Direct Broadcast Satellite: A Final Burial For Stanley V. Georgia(?), A National Obscenity Standard, And Other Miscellany, John V. Edwards
Obscenity In The Age Of Direct Broadcast Satellite: A Final Burial For Stanley V. Georgia(?), A National Obscenity Standard, And Other Miscellany, John V. Edwards
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V. Fcc: Requiem For A Heavyweight, Neal Devins
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V. Fcc: Requiem For A Heavyweight, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Future Of The Radio Format Change Controversy: The Case For The Competitive Marketplace, David M. Griffith
The Future Of The Radio Format Change Controversy: The Case For The Competitive Marketplace, David M. Griffith
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Local Service Concept In Broadcasting: An Evaluation And Recommendation For Change, Tom A. Collins
The Local Service Concept In Broadcasting: An Evaluation And Recommendation For Change, Tom A. Collins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Cable Television And The Fcc: A Crisis In Media Control, Jacob W. Mayer
Book Review Of Cable Television And The Fcc: A Crisis In Media Control, Jacob W. Mayer
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Advertising, Lee Loevinger
The Politics Of Advertising, Lee Loevinger
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law - Federal Communications Commission Fairness Doctrine - Applicability To Commercial Advertising. Friends Of The Earth V. Fcc, __F.2d__, 22 P&F Radio Reg. 2d 2145 (D.C. Cir. 1971), Thomas T. Terp
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.