Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Communication Technology and New Media

Selected Works

2005

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Don't Revive Failed Fairness Doctrine, Erik Ugland Aug 2005

Don't Revive Failed Fairness Doctrine, Erik Ugland

Erik Ugland

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Are These Victims Worthy?, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery May 2005

Are These Victims Worthy?, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery

Erik Ugland

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Digital Editing: It's Time To Tell All, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery Mar 2005

Digital Editing: It's Time To Tell All, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery

Erik Ugland

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Actually, There Is No Line ..., Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery Mar 2005

Actually, There Is No Line ..., Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery

Erik Ugland

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Ethics Of Staging, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery Jan 2005

The Ethics Of Staging, Erik Ugland, Karen Slattery

Erik Ugland

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Tattoos On Our Digital Skin: Anonymity, Privacy, And Accountability In Cyberspace, Sam Grey Dec 2004

Tattoos On Our Digital Skin: Anonymity, Privacy, And Accountability In Cyberspace, Sam Grey

Sam Grey

While it may be oddly flattering that Chapters, Amazon or HMV knew you would like the new Johnny Cash compilation album, you may be less than thrilled to discover that they also knew about your prescription drug addiction, your crabs, your bankruptcy, or your having skipped out on the rent one month back in 1993. When you add the possibility of your favourite e-retailer sharing your personal information- for a profit- to the frank probability of their having known it in the first place, what you initially found flattering may begin to appear more offensive and ominous. Simply put, there …

Go to article

The Opacity Of Transparency, Mark Fenster Dec 2004

The Opacity Of Transparency, Mark Fenster

Mark Fenster

The normative concept of transparency, along with the open government laws that purport to create a transparent public system of governance promise the world—a democratic and accountable state above all, and a peaceful, prosperous, and efficient one as well. But transparency, in its role as the theoretical justification for a set of legal commands, frustrates all parties affected by its ambiguities and abstractions. The public’s engagement with transparency in practice yields denials of reasonable requests for essential government information, as well as government meetings that occur behind closed doors. Meanwhile, state officials bemoan the significantly impaired decision-making processes that result …

Go to article