Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Torts-Alienation Of Parent's Affection, John J. Edman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a minor child, brought a tort action against defendant for enticing her mother to desert her, thereby depriving plaintiff of support, maintenance, and maternal care and affection. The trial court sustained defendant's demurrer. On appeal, held, affirmed. The statutes of the state provide other means of support of the child, and he has no right of action for the deprivation of a parent's love and affection. Nelson v. Richwagen, (Mass. 1950) 95 N.E. (2d) 545.
Witnesses--Competence Of Defendant's Spouse As Witness For The Prosecution, William R. Worth S.Ed.
Witnesses--Competence Of Defendant's Spouse As Witness For The Prosecution, William R. Worth S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Defendant, on trial for the offense of transporting across state lines a sum of money exceeding $5,000 feloniously obtained by fraud, was convicted largely through the testimony of his victim. The fraud charged consisted of a lightning courtship and hasty marriage, closely followed by the disappearance of the new husband along with the entire estate of the too-gullible bride. Over the objection of the defendant, his wife was permitted to testify to the swindle practiced upon her. After conviction, he filed a motion for a new trial, contending that it was error to permit a wife to testify against her …
Federal Courts-Granting Of New Trial On Initiative Of The Court, William F. Snyder S. Ed.
Federal Courts-Granting Of New Trial On Initiative Of The Court, William F. Snyder S. Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Following conviction for violation of a federal statute, petitioner was granted his release on a writ of habeas corpus by a federal district court, on the basis of uncontroverted testimony that his counsel had not been present when the jury returned its verdict. Within ten days of this release, a motion for rehearing was filed, supported by affidavits that his counsel actually had been present. On subsequent hearing, the court set aside its former order and remanded petitioner to custody, on the theory that his release was obtained by means of a fraud on the Court. The present action was …
Trusts - Constructive Trusts - Breach Of Fiduciary Relation Between Husband And Wife With Respect To Oral Agreement Concerning Land
Michigan Law Review
In her last illness, Mrs. Jackson desired to transfer realty to her married daughter, plaintiff herein. To prevent creditors of the daughter's husband from reaching the property, Mrs. Jackson conveyed the land to her husband, Mr. Jackson, with the parol understanding that "he would see that Cora got it." Jackson failed to transfer the land and upon his death it passed under an ante-nuptial settlement to defendant, his second wife. In an action to recover the land, the court stated that defendant was in the position of a bona fide purchaser for value, and held that the statute of frauds …
Telegraph, Telephone And Wireless-Tapping
Telegraph, Telephone And Wireless-Tapping
Michigan Law Review
A recent Federal case, Olmstead v. United States, suggests an interesting problem. Evidence obtained by Federal authorities, who tapped private telephone wires, was admitted in a criminal prosecution. It seems to be the general rule that fraudulently, wrongfully, or illegally procured evidence is admissible, if otherwise admissible. And certainly the courts have required telegraph companies to disclose messages to aid criminal prosecutions. Telegraph operators have been compelled to testify. And even where a state statute forbade disclosure of the message by the company, a subpoena duces tecum has compelled the production of a telegram to aid the courts. Testimony …
Arson-Statutory Chance Of Common Law Requisites
Arson-Statutory Chance Of Common Law Requisites
Michigan Law Review
At common Jaw, arson was a clearly defined felony, including only certain kinds of burnings. According to Lord Coke, it was the malicious and voluntary burning!' of the house of another by night or by day, 3 INST. 66. There were certain well-understood essentials constituting the crime. The structure must have been a house or an out-house; it must have been the house of another; it must have been inhabited, though not actually occupied, at the time of the burning. The structure must have been a completed one; there must have been an actual burning-at least to the extent of …