Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Common Law

William & Mary Law School

Series

Legal History

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Were Justices Lawyers?, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2020

Were Justices Lawyers?, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Popular Media

No abstract provided.


Legal Genres, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2020

Legal Genres, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Popular Media

No abstract provided.


Who Are The "We"?, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2020

Who Are The "We"?, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Popular Media

No abstract provided.


Putting The People Into Legal History, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2020

Putting The People Into Legal History, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Popular Media

No abstract provided.


The Overly Familiar Treatise, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2020

The Overly Familiar Treatise, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Popular Media

No abstract provided.


Creating A Literature For The King’S Courts In The Later Thirteenth Century: Hengham Magna, Fet Asaver, And Bracton, Thomas J. Mcsweeney Mar 2016

Creating A Literature For The King’S Courts In The Later Thirteenth Century: Hengham Magna, Fet Asaver, And Bracton, Thomas J. Mcsweeney

Faculty Publications

The early common law produced a rich literature. This article examines two of the most popular legal treatises of the second half of the thirteenth century, Hengham Magna and Fet Asaver. It has long been recognized that these two treatises bear some relationship to each other. This article will attempt to establish that relationship, arguing that Hengham Magna and Fet Asaver were written by different people; that Fet Asaver borrows from Hengham Magna; and that the authors of both texts had independent access to the Bracton treatise. The article concludes by suggesting a new way to think about the legal …