Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Assorted Anti-Leegin Canards: Why Resistance Is Misguided And Futile, Alan J. Meese Jul 2013

Assorted Anti-Leegin Canards: Why Resistance Is Misguided And Futile, Alan J. Meese

Faculty Publications

In Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007), the Supreme Court reversed Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), which had banned minimum resale price maintenance (“minimum RPM”) as unlawful per se. For many, Leegin was a straightforward exercise of the Court’s long-recognized authority, implied by the Sherman Act’s rule of reason, to adjust antitrust doctrine in light of new economic learning. In particular, Leegin invoked the teachings of transaction cost economics (“TCE”), which holds that many non-standard agreements, including minimum RPM, are voluntary mechanisms …


Clashing Policies Or Confusing Precedents: The "Gross Negligence" Exception To Consequential Damages Disclaimers, Michael Pillow Apr 2013

Clashing Policies Or Confusing Precedents: The "Gross Negligence" Exception To Consequential Damages Disclaimers, Michael Pillow

William & Mary Business Law Review

Consequential damages can easily amount to millions of dollars. Commercial parties often disclaim consequential damages in their contracts. This Article posits that such disclaimers between commercial parties under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) should not be found unenforceable based on gross negligence. Article 2 of the UCC promotes the policy of freedom of contract. Consistent with that policy, section 2-719 of the UCC provides that contractual consequential damages disclaimers should be enforceable absent a finding of unconscionability. This Article analyzes the interplay among UCC section 2-719, “public policy” exceptions to enforcing limitations of liability, and the law of gross negligence. …


Explaining "Bait-And-Switch" Regulation, David Adam Friedman Apr 2013

Explaining "Bait-And-Switch" Regulation, David Adam Friedman

William & Mary Business Law Review

“Bait and switch” can describe a range of commercial behaviors common in the everyday marketplace, but virtually ignored in the academic literature. The traditional definition of unlawful bait and switch applies to insincere offers to sell one item in order to induce the buyer to purchase another. Certain sellers have historically employed bait-and-switch tactics, including urban retailers, aluminum siding companies, and supermarkets.

Colloquially, this definition can also cover lawful or other borderline sales tactics, including the use of teaser rates or low introductory pricing, or even “free offers.” Even common lawful tactics, like the deliberate routing of customers past other …


The Rise Of Urban Agriculture: A Cautionary Tale – No Rules, Big Problems, Matthew V. Bradshaw Feb 2013

The Rise Of Urban Agriculture: A Cautionary Tale – No Rules, Big Problems, Matthew V. Bradshaw

William & Mary Business Law Review

This Note identifies the underlying cause of the collapse of the family farm, namely the failed effort of the U.S. Government to save it through the institution and ongoing promulgation of the Farm Bill. Through subsidy and direct payment regimes, federal legislation has enabled large commodity producers to enjoy protection from market risk while squeezing out smaller growers. Because of growing consumer distrust in large-scale agricultural production, the urban agriculture movement and nontraditional market systems continue to grow in popularity and footprint across the United States. Many municipalities have already recognized the vast benefits that an urban agriculture regime can …