Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Commercial Law

PDF

University of Michigan Law School

Journal

1939

Negligence

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Sales - Implied Warranty By Victualler, Michigan Law Review Dec 1939

Sales - Implied Warranty By Victualler, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff purchased a meal at defendant's restaurant, in connection with which he was served contaminated drinking water obtained from defendant's well; he became ill from drinking the water. Plaintiff sued on the theory of implied warranty by defendant of the fitness of the water sold under the Uniform Sales Act, and on the ground that the service of the contaminated water in violation of the Ohio Pure Food Law constituted negligence by defendant. Held, plaintiff may recover on either theory. Yochem v. Gloria, Inc., 134 Ohio St. 427, 17 N. E. (2d) 731 (1938).


Sales - Implied Warranties Running To Ultimate Consumer - Is Privity Of Contract Necessary?, William K. Jackson Apr 1939

Sales - Implied Warranties Running To Ultimate Consumer - Is Privity Of Contract Necessary?, William K. Jackson

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff's husband purchased from defendant, a large retailer, minced ham and liverwurst manufactured by another concern. Plaintiff with other members of the family became ill after eating the liverwurst. An appeal was taken from a directed verdict for defendant. Held, when food is sold, there is no implied warranty of wholesomeness running from the retailer to the ultimate consumer; for the remedy is based on contract and limited to parties and privies thereto. Borucki v. MacKenzie Bros. Co., Inc., (Conn. 1938) 3 A. (2d) 224.