Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Antitrust reform (1)
- Antitrust regulation (1)
- Baseball (1)
-
- Collective bargaining (1)
- Curt flood act (1)
- Federal Baseball Club Incorporated v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs (1)
- Federal antitrust law (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Flood act (1)
- Flood v. Kuhn (1)
- Graduate assistants (1)
- Higher education (1)
- Labor history (1)
- Marketplace competition (1)
- Minor league (1)
- Minor league baseball (1)
- National Labor Relations Board (1)
- Sherman antitrust act (1)
- Sports (1)
- Sports law (1)
- Student employees (1)
- Supreme court (1)
- Toolson v. N.Y. Yankees Incorporated (1)
- Union bargaining (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players, Jeremy Ulm
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players, Jeremy Ulm
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 1890, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act to protect competition in the marketplace. Federal antitrust law has developed to prevent businesses from exerting unfair power on their employees and customers. Specifically, the Sherman Act prevents competitors from reaching unreasonable agreements amongst themselves and from monopolizing markets. However, not all industries have these protections.
Historically, federal antitrust law has not governed the “Business of Baseball.” The Supreme Court had the opportunity to apply antitrust law to baseball in Federal Baseball Club, Incorporated v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs; however, the Court held that the Business of Baseball was not …
A Different Set Of Rules? Nlrb Proposed Rule Making And Student Worker Unionization Rights, William A. Herbert, Joseph Van Der Naald
A Different Set Of Rules? Nlrb Proposed Rule Making And Student Worker Unionization Rights, William A. Herbert, Joseph Van Der Naald
Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy
This article presents data, precedent, and empirical evidence relevant to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposal to issue a new rule to exclude graduate assistants and other student employees from coverage under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The analysis in three parts. First, the authors show through an analysis of information from other federal agencies that the adoption of the proposed NLRB rule would exclude over 81,000 graduate assistants on private campuses from the right to unionize and engage in collective bargaining. Second, the article presents a legal history from the past half-century about unionization of student employees …