Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Advanced Placement (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- American Indians (1)
- California (1)
- Castaneda v. Regents of the University of California (1)
-
- Colleges and universities (1)
- Congress (1)
- Criteria (1)
- Daniel v. California (1)
- Davis v. United States (1)
- Freedman (1)
- Indian Civil Rights Act (1)
- Indian blood (1)
- Native Americans (1)
- Proposition 209 (1)
- Public schools (1)
- School districts (1)
- School funding (1)
- Seminole Nation (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Sovereign immunity (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Tribal sovereignty (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Plight Of "Nappy-Headed" Indians: The Role Of Tribal Sovereignty In The Systematic Discrimination Against Black Freedmen By The Federal Government And Native American Tribes, Terrion L. Williamson
The Plight Of "Nappy-Headed" Indians: The Role Of Tribal Sovereignty In The Systematic Discrimination Against Black Freedmen By The Federal Government And Native American Tribes, Terrion L. Williamson
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Note concerns the role the government has played in the exclusion of Black Freedmen from Native American nations through its implementation and interpretation of the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity ("tribal sovereignty" or "tribal immunity"). Part I discusses the background of the Freedmen within the Five Civilized Tribes and provides an overview of the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity, including its role in the controversy concerning the status of Black Indians. Part II discusses the interpretations given to the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity by United States courts and executive agencies and the effects of those interpretations on relations …
Challenging The Bounds Of Education Litigation: Castaneda V. Regents And Daniel V. California, Alan E. Schoenfeld
Challenging The Bounds Of Education Litigation: Castaneda V. Regents And Daniel V. California, Alan E. Schoenfeld
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Note argues that by combining the normative suasion of educational finance litigation with the political imperatives manifested in affirmative action law and practice, those who seek to improve the quality of secondary education and expand access to higher education would likely effect greater change than they would working independently. Under the appropriate political and legal circumstances, access to public higher education ought to be treated as something akin to a fundamental right, the unequal distribution of which constitutes a violation of equal protection for students of color and for economically disadvantaged students. Using the Castaneda and Daniel lawsuits to …