Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- "Reasonable Woman" Standard (1)
- Arab Americans; Critical race theory (1)
- Blaming the Victim (1)
- Congressional Power (1)
- Federal government (1)
-
- Legislative Findings (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Middle Eastern Legal Scholarship (1)
- Middle Easterners (1)
- Race discrimination -- Study & teaching (1)
- Racial Classification (1)
- Respondeat superior (1)
- Sexual Harassment (1)
- Standard of review (Law) (1)
- Standard of the Reasonable Victim in the Same Circumstances as the Plaintiff (1)
- Voting (1)
- Voting Rights Act (1)
- Voting Rights Act of 1965 (1)
- Whiteness (1)
- Workplace (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why Don't "Reasonable Women" Complain About Sexual Harassment?, L. Camille Hébert
Why Don't "Reasonable Women" Complain About Sexual Harassment?, L. Camille Hébert
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Compulsory Whiteness: Towards A Middle Eastern Legal Scholarship, John Tehranian
Compulsory Whiteness: Towards A Middle Eastern Legal Scholarship, John Tehranian
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Legislative Findings, Congressional Powers, And The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Legislative Findings, Congressional Powers, And The Future Of The Voting Rights Act, Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Indiana Law Journal
In enacting the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Congress sought to overcome decades of outright refusal to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment. The statute was considered "harsh " and "punitive" by critics, and the Supreme Court partially agreed, calling the legislation "stringent, " inventive, " and "uncommon. " Yet the Court ultimately sided with the national ruling coalition as represented by the administration and overwhelming congressional majorities. This Article examines the early internal debates over the constitutionality of the Act and concludes that the question of legislative findings played a key role. In particular, internal notes and memoranda from the Katzenbach …