Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Marriage equality (3)
- Prop 8 (3)
- Same-sex marriage (3)
- Hollingsworth (2)
- Amici curiae (1)
-
- Citizens united (1)
- DOMA cases (1)
- David boyle (1)
- Gay rights (1)
- Hollingsworth v. perry (1)
- In re marriage cases (1)
- Judge Vaughn Walker (1)
- LBGTQ rights (1)
- Liberty life and law foundation (1)
- Michael A. Zamperini/W. Clay Burchell Endowed Scholarship (1)
- Perry (1)
- Proposition 8 (1)
- Westboro baptist church (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Couple Marks 20 Years Of Helping Gay Law Students, Elliot Owen
Couple Marks 20 Years Of Helping Gay Law Students, Elliot Owen
Articles About GGU Law
Golden Gate University third year law school student Kate Baldridge was awarded the Michael A. Zamperini / W. Clay Burchell Endowed Scholarship during an event last month at the Coblentz Patch Duffy and Bass LLP offices in San Francisco's Ferry Building.
Marriage And The Court: San Francisco's Role In The Debate, Kathleen Morris
Marriage And The Court: San Francisco's Role In The Debate, Kathleen Morris
Publications
No abstract provided.
Proposition 8 Oral Arguments, Cassie Heuckroth
Proposition 8 Oral Arguments, Cassie Heuckroth
GGU Law Review Blog
No abstract provided.
Friends In Low Places, Cassie Heuckroth
Friends In Low Places, Cassie Heuckroth
GGU Law Review Blog
Found on the blog at: http://ggulawreview.org/2013/03/20/friends-in-low-places/
Hollingsworth V. Perry: United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari To Hear The ‘Prop 8′ Case, Executive Online Editor
Hollingsworth V. Perry: United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari To Hear The ‘Prop 8′ Case, Executive Online Editor
GGU Law Review Blog
No abstract provided.
Save Our Children: Overcoming The Narrative That Gays And Lesbians Are Harmful To Children, Anthony S. Niedwiecki
Save Our Children: Overcoming The Narrative That Gays And Lesbians Are Harmful To Children, Anthony S. Niedwiecki
Publications
This paper focuses on how gay rights activists had no real choice but to use the court system to advance marriage rights for same-sex couples because they were unable to use the political process to effectively rebut the claim that gays and lesbian were harmful to children. Part I begins with an overview of the ways in which the initiative process has been used to limit gay rights and prevent marriage equality. It then details how, in contrast to the political process, courts have been more receptive to advancing marriage rights for same-sex couples. Part II details Walter Fisher's narrative …