Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Choice of law (3)
- CJRA (2)
- Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (2)
- Empirical legal studies (2)
- Law (2)
-
- Practice of law (2)
- Adversarial process (1)
- American jury system (1)
- Attorney for the parents (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Binding effect (1)
- Binding judgment (1)
- Case selection (1)
- Child advocacy (1)
- Child's advocate (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil child protection cases (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Commercial Law/Tort Law (1)
- Compensatory damages awards (1)
- Conflict of law (1)
- David Steinberg (1)
- Debtor (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Forum (1)
- Forum shopping (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Good faith (1)
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Law
Juries: Arbiters Or Arbitrary?, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
Juries: Arbiters Or Arbitrary?, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The Predictability Of Punitive Damages, Theodore Eisenberg, John Goerdt, Brian Ostrom, David Rottman, Martin T. Wells
The Predictability Of Punitive Damages, Theodore Eisenberg, John Goerdt, Brian Ostrom, David Rottman, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Using one year of jury trial outcomes from 45 of the nation's most populous counties, this article shows a strong and statistically significant correlation between compensatory and punitive damages. These findings are replicated in 25 years of punitive damages awards from Cook County, Illinois, and California. In addition, we find no evidence that punitive damages awards are more likely when individuals sue businesses than when individuals sue individuals. With respect to award frequency, juries rarely award punitive damages and appear to be especially reluctant to do so in the areas of law that have captured the most attention, products liability …
"And The Truth Shall Make You Free": Truth As A First Amendment Defense In Tortious Interference With Contract Cases, Robert L. Tucker
"And The Truth Shall Make You Free": Truth As A First Amendment Defense In Tortious Interference With Contract Cases, Robert L. Tucker
Akron Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Legal Process And Choice Of Law, William L. Reynolds
Legal Process And Choice Of Law, William L. Reynolds
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Happens When Parties Fail To Prove Foreign Law?, William L. Reynolds
What Happens When Parties Fail To Prove Foreign Law?, William L. Reynolds
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Some Realism About Federal Procedural Reform, Carl W. Tobias
Some Realism About Federal Procedural Reform, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
A New Confederacy? Disunionism in the Federal Courts is a thought-provoking tour de force about many ills that federal court observers believe plague the modem federal district courts. In Disunionism, Professor Paul Carrington paints a perceptive portrait of the troubling conditions that he asserts impede civil litigation in a number of districts, and he trenchantly criticizes district judges for their contributions to these circumstances while admonishing the Judicial Conference to sweep "our national courts clear of all local clutter."
Simplifying The Choice Of Forum: A Reply, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Simplifying The Choice Of Forum: A Reply, Kevin M. Clermont, Theodore Eisenberg
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
We have three things to think about here, as the real estate agents say—“location, location, location.” Accordingly, the two of us have engaged for several years in empirical studies aimed at gauging the effect of forum on case outcome. The results to date strongly suggest that forum really matters. An early piece of the puzzle fell into place in our study of venue. In that article, we examined the benefits and costs of the federal courts scheme of transfer of civil venue “in the interest of justice.” Ours was a pretty straightforward and simple cost-benefit analysis, but we supported it …
The Litigious Plaintiff Hypothesis: Case Selection And Resolution, Theodore Eisenberg, Henry S. Farber
The Litigious Plaintiff Hypothesis: Case Selection And Resolution, Theodore Eisenberg, Henry S. Farber
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The process through which cases are selected for litigation cannot be ignored because it yields a set of lawsuits and plaintiffs that is far from a random selection either of potential claims or of potential claimants. We present a theoretical framework for understanding the operation of this suit-selection process and its relationship to the underlying distribution of potential claims and claimants. The model has implications for the trial rate and the plaintiff win rate at trial. Our empirical analysis, using data on over 200,000 federal civil litigations, yields results that are strongly consistent with the theory.
Whoever Fights Monsters Should See To It That In The Process He Does Not Become A Monster: Hunting The Sexual Predator With Silver Bullets -- Federal Rules Of Evidence 413-415 -- And A Stake Through The Heart -- Kansas V. Hendricks, Joelle A. Moreno
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Interest Groups, Contracts And Interest Analysis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Larry E. Ribstein
Interest Groups, Contracts And Interest Analysis, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Larry E. Ribstein
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Interjurisdictional Preclusion, Howard M. Erichson
Interjurisdictional Preclusion, Howard M. Erichson
Faculty Scholarship
Res judicata is hard enough already. Consider it at the interjurisdictional level, and we are asking for headaches. But consider it at that level we must, because litigation trends make interjurisdictional preclusion1 more important than ever. Lawyers, judges, litigants, and other litigation participants increasingly must contemplate the possibility that a lawsuit will have claim-preclusive or issue-preclusive effect in a subsequent suit in another jurisdiction. This article examines the problem of interjurisdictional preclusion, and, in particular, the problem of choice of preclusion law. Choice of-preclusion law cannot be appreciated in the abstract, but rather must be considered in light of litigation …
Debtors' Good Faith In Us Bankruptcy Proceedings, Chen Yang
Debtors' Good Faith In Us Bankruptcy Proceedings, Chen Yang
LLM Theses and Essays
Bankruptcy is a judicial process purporting to regulate and adjust the financial relationships between debtors and creditors which come into a deadlock. In the modern United States, bankruptcy has become a concept pervading each corner of the social and economic lives. It touches mass tort victims, large corporations, small family business, government institutions, and even normal individuals. The appearance of the modern bankruptcy law of the United States is signaled by the enactment of the Bankruptcy Reform Act in 1978 which, together with later amendments, constitute the current Bankruptcy Code of the United States; but also help them strategically restructure …
Lawyers' Roles In Child Protection, Donald N. Duquette
Lawyers' Roles In Child Protection, Donald N. Duquette
Book Chapters
What roles and responsibilities do lawyers assume in civil child protection cases? As distinguished from other legal proceedings which may grow from a case of child maltreatment, civil child protection proceedings focus on the child and the child's needs. These civil cases are not concerned with punishing an offender, recovering money damages from a person or institution who may have harmed a child, or suspending someone from a professional license. The focus here is on the proper care and custody of the child.
Retroactivity And Legal Change: An Equilibrium Approach, Jill E. Fisch
Retroactivity And Legal Change: An Equilibrium Approach, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, Professor Fisch assesses currrent retroactivity doctrine and proposes a new framework for retroactivity analysis. Current law has failed to reflect the complexity of defining retroactivity and to harmonize the conflicting concerns of efficiency and fairness that animate retroactivity doctrine. By drawing a sharp distinction between adjudication and legislation, the law has also overlooked the similarity of the issues that retroactivity raises in both contexts. Professor Fisch's analysis, influenced by the legal process school, uses an equilibrium approach to connect retroactivity analysis to theories of legal change. Instead of focusing on the nature of the new legal rule, …
Implementing Procedural Change: Who, How, Why, And When?, Stephen B. Burbank
Implementing Procedural Change: Who, How, Why, And When?, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Contemplating The End Of Federal Civil Justice Reform In Montana, Carl W. Tobias
Contemplating The End Of Federal Civil Justice Reform In Montana, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
In continuation of the series of essays analyzing and documenting federal civil justice reform, this essay first provides an update on developments in civil justice reform nationally and in the United States District Court of Montana (Montana District). The essay then stresses the continuing work of the Ninth Circuit District Local Rules Review Committee and additional issues relating to case assignments in the Montana District. Finally, the essay takes a glimpse into the future.
Magistrate Judges In The Montana Federal District, Carl W. Tobias
Magistrate Judges In The Montana Federal District, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Over the last three decades, growing caseloads and finite resources have fostered expansion of the jurisdiction, responsibilities, prestige and compensation of United States Magistrate Judges. Passage of the Civil Justice Reform Act (CJRA) of 1990, which required local experimentation with procedures for reducing expense and delay in civil litigation, propelled this development in many of the ninety-four federal districts across the country. The United States District Court for the District of Montana has quite strongly evidenced these phenomena. Perhaps most important, the CJRA expense and delay reduction plan that the district prescribed in 1991 included an opt-out procedure which it …
Sexual Character Evidence In Civil Actions: Refining The Propensity Rule, Jane H. Aiken
Sexual Character Evidence In Civil Actions: Refining The Propensity Rule, Jane H. Aiken
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
When claims of sexual misconduct are made, two threads are often seen in the kinds of questions raised: Did she "invite it," and has he ever done it before? The way these questions are handled can determine the outcome of a sexual misconduct case. In 1995, Congress weighed in on whether these questions could be asked in civil cases in federal court and adopted two significant changes to the rules of evidence. One, revised Rule 412,4 extends "rape shield" protection to civil actions that claim sexual misconduct, including sexual harassment. The other, new Rule 415,5 allows plaintiffs to offer evidence …
Discovery In International Legal Developments Year In Review: 1996, Christopher J. Borgen
Discovery In International Legal Developments Year In Review: 1996, Christopher J. Borgen
Faculty Publications
American procedure regarding international discovery stems from 28 U.S.C. §§ 1781-83, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP or Rule) 28(b). Broadly speaking, these rules are concerned with the mechanics of assessing requests for discovery in the United States to assist a proceeding in a foreign country and attempts by one or more parties before a U.S. court to obtain evidence located in another country. This article serves as a brief review of developments during the year.
Class Action Chaos? The Theory Of The Core And An Analysis Of Opt-Out Rights In Mass Tort Class Actions, Michael A. Perino
Class Action Chaos? The Theory Of The Core And An Analysis Of Opt-Out Rights In Mass Tort Class Actions, Michael A. Perino
Faculty Publications
From breast implants to cigarettes, mass tort class actions are a prominent and controversial part of the contemporary litigation landscape. A critical component of these actions is the ability of class members to “opt out” and thereby exclude themselves from the effect of any class judgment. The tension between individual autonomy and the desire for global resolution of mass controversies has led to an intense debate concerning the circumstances under which opt-out rights should be constrained, if at all.
This Article makes five distinct contributions to the class action literature. First, the Article applies the game theoretic concept of the …
A Worthy Champion For Fourteenth Amendment Rights: The United States In Parens Patriae, Larry Yackle
A Worthy Champion For Fourteenth Amendment Rights: The United States In Parens Patriae, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
When the Clinton Administration announced its intention to challenge Proposition 209, the new prohibition on affirmative action in California, the Justice Department declined to say whether the United States would formally intervene in the lawsuit already under way or merely file an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs. Casual observers may have assumed that the Administration considered the form of its participation to raise further political and strategic considerations. That was undoubtedly true. It was also true, however, that Justice Department lawyers faced a legal question as well. According to the precedents on point, the United States required an authorizing statute …