Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Mcdonnell Douglas V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Linda R.S. V. Richard D., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Linda R.S. V. Richard D., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railroad Co. V. Wichita Board Of Trade, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railroad Co. V. Wichita Board Of Trade, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1972

Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Pendent Jurisdiction - The Problem Of "Pendenting Parties", William H. Fortune Jan 1972

Pendent Jurisdiction - The Problem Of "Pendenting Parties", William H. Fortune

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Federal courts have generally discouraged the joinder of a third party solely on the basis of a claim pendent to a federal cause of action. They have, however, been more liberal in allowing joinder in diversity cases. The author reviews the case law and argues that a more liberal attitude toward joinder should be adopted, except in diversity cases where, he believes, liberal joinder erodes the requirement of complete diversity.


Venue Of Civil Actions In Kentucky, William H. Fortune Jan 1972

Venue Of Civil Actions In Kentucky, William H. Fortune

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The purpose of this paper is primarily to analyze Kentucky’s venue statutes, and secondarily to suggest the path to reform. The paper is divided into four parts. Part I is a brief history of the confusion in Kentucky between jurisdiction and venue. Some exposure to this history is essential to an understanding of the older cases, which in some areas are the only cases in point. Part II is an analysis of the four major venue statutes in KRS Chapter 454: KRS § 452.400—actions involving land; KRS § 452.450-actions against corporations; KRS § 452.460—actions for personal injury or property damage; …