Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Apologies (1)
- Causation (1)
- Citizen suits (1)
- Class certification (1)
- Collateral estoppel (1)
-
- Colorado (1)
- Compromise (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- District courts (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Empirical research (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Government agencies (1)
- Harm (1)
- Informed consent (1)
- Injury (1)
- Medical malpractice (1)
- Necessity (1)
- Nike v. Kasky (1)
- Political questions and judicial power (1)
- Private enforcement (1)
- Private speech (1)
- Products liability (1)
- Public speech (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Risks (1)
- Robbennolt (Jennifer) (1)
- Rule 23(b)(2) (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Uncertainty And Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert, Margaret A. Berger, Aaron D. Twerski
Uncertainty And Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert, Margaret A. Berger, Aaron D. Twerski
Michigan Law Review
This Article will first examine why it is that plaintiffs have been unable to prove causation under the Daubert guidelines in toxic tort litigation. Second, it will look at the two existing models for informed choice litigation medical malpractice and products liability-and demonstrate why neither of these models gives toxic tort plaintiffs a fair opportunity to recover for the deprivation of patient autonomy against drug manufacturers who have breached their duty to warn of known or knowable risks. Finally, this Article will explore the elements of a causation-free informed choice cause of action. It will suggest the appropriate standard for …
There Is Always A Need: The "Necessity Doctrine" And Class Certification Against Government Agencies, Daniel Tenny
There Is Always A Need: The "Necessity Doctrine" And Class Certification Against Government Agencies, Daniel Tenny
Michigan Law Review
On its face, Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seems tailor-made for lawsuits against government. Rule 23(b)(2) allows a class action when "the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole." This situation arises frequently in people's dealings with government agencies: recipients of public benefits and consumers using public utilities, for example, constitute large groups of people all subject to identical government policies who might seek injunctive relief. Litigants attempting …
Private Attorneys General And The First Amendment, Trevor W. Morrison
Private Attorneys General And The First Amendment, Trevor W. Morrison
Michigan Law Review
The "private attorney general" is under fire again. It has been in and out of favor in the six decades since it was named, in part because it has come to signify so many different things. At its core, however, the term denotes a plaintiff who sues to vindicate public interests not directly connected to any special stake of her own. The remedies sought in such actions tend to be correspondingly broad: rather than seeking redress for discrete injuries, private attorneys general typically request injunctive or other equitable relief aimed at altering the practices of large institutions. From school desegregation …
Apology Within A Moral Dialectic: A Reply To Professor Robbennolt, Lee Taft
Apology Within A Moral Dialectic: A Reply To Professor Robbennolt, Lee Taft
Michigan Law Review
Over the last several years, much has been written about the role of apology in facilitating the resolution of legal disputes. Within this body of work a debate has developed among legal scholars, practitioners, and legislators. Under traditional rules of evidence an apology which acknowledged fault would enter evidence as an admission against interest. Now there is a movement to legislatively "protect" apologies from the effects of the traditional rule in order to facilitate apology without evidentiary encumbrance. Scholars who have argued in favor of the relaxation of the traditional rule have largely relied on anecdotal evidence to support their …