Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Discovery-Oral Examination-Right To, And Scope Of, Cross-Examination Under New York And Federal Procedure, Daniel A. Isaacson
Discovery-Oral Examination-Right To, And Scope Of, Cross-Examination Under New York And Federal Procedure, Daniel A. Isaacson
Michigan Law Review
At the close of plaintiff's pre-trial examination of. defendant corporation's employee on the question of failure to make delivery of merchandise pursuant to certain contracts, attorney for defendant began to cross-examine. Plaintiff objected to this procedure but permitted the cross-examination to continue, reserving his right to make application to the court to strike out the testimony. Held, testimony stricken. There should be no cross-examination in a pre-trial examination except for the limited purpose of clarifying an answer given on direct examination, and cross-examination to elicit additional information to that already adduced by the moving party or to give a …