Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Class action (2)
- Arbitration (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil procedure (1)
- Communitarianism (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Due process (1)
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Employment law (1)
- Group cohesion (1)
- Hybrid class action (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Iqbal (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Liberalism (1)
- Manifest Disregard (1)
- Multi-district litigation (1)
- Nonclass aggregation (1)
- Phillips Petroleum v. Shutts (1)
- Pleading (1)
- Procedural Justice (1)
- Rule 23 (1)
- Rule 23(b)(2) (1)
- Rule 23(b)(3) (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Twombly (1)
- Wal-Mart (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Iqbal, Twombly, And The Lessons Of The Celotex Trilogy, Hillel Y. Levin
Iqbal, Twombly, And The Lessons Of The Celotex Trilogy, Hillel Y. Levin
Scholarly Works
This Essay compares the Twombly/Iqbal line of cases to the Celotex trilogy and suggests that developments since the latter offer lessons for the former. Some of the comparisons are obvious: decreased access and increased judicial discretion. However, one important similarity has not been well understood: that the driving force in both contexts has been the lower courts rather than the Supreme Court. Further, while we can expect additional access barriers to be erected in the future, our focus should be on lower courts, rather than other institutional players, as the likely source of those barriers.
Manifest Disregard And The Imperfect Procedural Justice Of Arbitration, Thomas V. Burch
Manifest Disregard And The Imperfect Procedural Justice Of Arbitration, Thomas V. Burch
Scholarly Works
Arbitration is an efficient dispute-resolution system that respects parties’ right to an accurate award. But because arbitration is designed to be efficient, accuracy is not guaranteed. This presents a challenge when courts are asked to confirm or vacate arbitrators’ decisions. Judges dislike approving inaccurate awards, especially in cases where parties have unequal bargaining power. Yet, judges also recognize arbitration’s limited-review principle. So they are forced to balance their desire for accuracy against arbitration’s efficiency policy. Efficiency typically wins at the expense of accurate outcomes.
This Article contends that courts place too much emphasis on the efficiency policy in mandatory arbitration. …
Introduction: Dukes V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Introduction: Dukes V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
This short introduction to Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. aims to explain the case and to set the table for what promises to be thought-provoking roundtable discussion hosted by Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc. Accordingly, what follows is a concise overview of the legal background and current debate over the two procedural issues that the Ninth Circuit explored in detail – how to evaluate Rule 23(a)(2)’s commonality when common questions heavily implicate the case’s merits, and when a Rule 23(b)(2) class can include relief apart from injunctive or declaratory relief without endangering due process.
Aggregation, Community, And The Line Between, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Aggregation, Community, And The Line Between, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
As class-action theorists, we sometimes focus so heavily on the class certification threshold that we neglect to reassess the line itself. The current line asks whether procedurally aggregated individuals form a sufficiently cohesive group before the decision to sue. Given this symposium’s topic - the state of aggregate litigation and the boundaries of class actions in the decade after Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor and Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. - the time is ripe to challenge our assumptions about this line in non-class aggregation. Accordingly, this Article examines group cohesion and asks whether the current line is the only dividing …