Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Employee Benefits Up-Date: Coping With Chaos, Mark S. Dray
Employee Benefits Up-Date: Coping With Chaos, Mark S. Dray
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Alternatives To Buy-Sell Agreements And Business Succession Planning, Myron E. Sildon
Alternatives To Buy-Sell Agreements And Business Succession Planning, Myron E. Sildon
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Intangible Asset Depreciation: Newark And Section 197, Kenneth W. Gideon
Intangible Asset Depreciation: Newark And Section 197, Kenneth W. Gideon
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Buy-Sell Agreements For The Family Owned Business: Practical Considerations And Planning Opportunities, Morton A. Harris
Buy-Sell Agreements For The Family Owned Business: Practical Considerations And Planning Opportunities, Morton A. Harris
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments Affecting Real Estate And Partnerships, Stefan F. Tucker
Recent Developments Affecting Real Estate And Partnerships, Stefan F. Tucker
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
An Improved Choice: The Virginia Limited Liability Company, James J. Wheaton
An Improved Choice: The Virginia Limited Liability Company, James J. Wheaton
Faculty Publications
When the General Assembly adopted the Virginia Limited Liability Company Act (the "Act")' in 1991, Virginia joined just four other states in recognizing the potential of a relatively obscure business entity, the limited liability company ("LLC"). The LLC concept has spread rapidly since the adoption of the Virginia Act early last year. Three other states enacted LLC legislation in 1991, and in just the first few months of 1992, six more states followed the trend.
[...]
Although the number of LLCs formed in Virginia since the Virginia Act took effect last July displays the willingness of Virginia attorneys to recommend …
When Is A Corporate Executive "Substantially Unfit To Serve"?, Jayne W. Barnard
When Is A Corporate Executive "Substantially Unfit To Serve"?, Jayne W. Barnard
Faculty Publications
The recently enacted Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 provides that, in an SEC enforcement action, a federal court may enjoin or "disbar" the defendant from serving in the future as an officer or director of a public company. A court may enter such an order if it finds that the defendant is "substantially unfit" to serve as a corporate executive; the Act, however, does not define "substantial unfitness." In this Article Professor Jayne Barnard provides a framework for defining this term and identifying the defendants to which the Remedies Act should apply. Professor Barnard begins …