Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Corporations-Liability Of Promoters For Secret Profit
Corporations-Liability Of Promoters For Secret Profit
Michigan Law Review
In view of the peculiar position of control which a promoter occupies in relation to the proposed corporation, with resultant opportunities for making unconscionable profits, courts have uniformly regarded him as standing in a fiduciary relationship toward the corporation. Accordingly, when a promoter seeks to make a profit from a transfer of property to the corporation, he must obtain the consent of the latter under penalty of having to disgorge such profit at a later time at the suit of the corporation itself or persons acting in the latter's behalf. Such liability is to be distinguished from the liability of …
Corporations - Rights Of Creditors Of Insolvent Corporation - Greater Than Rights Of Corporation
Corporations - Rights Of Creditors Of Insolvent Corporation - Greater Than Rights Of Corporation
Michigan Law Review
The dissenting and majority opinions of Justices Roberts and Cardozo in the recent case of McCandless v. Furlaud are illustrative of basically divergent conceptions of the status and function of the corporate receiver. In the following examination and evaluation of these conflicting positions, attention will be directed chiefly to those situations involving the problem of promoter's profits. The language and attitude of the courts, however, is typical of that adopted in all cases in which the questions considered arise and the conclusions suggested are of general application.
Corporations - Liability Of Directors To Creditors For Negligent Management
Corporations - Liability Of Directors To Creditors For Negligent Management
Michigan Law Review
There is much confusion in the cases concerning a director's liability to a creditor for negligent management of the corporation. A clearer answer might be indicated by an examination of analogous situations involving individuals instead of corporations. It adds confusion to the law to have a different rule for a corporation than for a human being, and such a result should be avoided unless separate treatment is required by something inherent in the corporation. The least that can happen if a court thinks along these lines is that it will be more likely to know what it is doing.