Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

Corporations-The Executive Committee In Corporate Organization-Scope Of Powers, Dickson M. Saunders Aug 1943

Corporations-The Executive Committee In Corporate Organization-Scope Of Powers, Dickson M. Saunders

Michigan Law Review

From the very beginning of the use of the corporate structure as a device for carrying on the businesses and activities of man, it has been apparent that the nominal brain, the board of directors, could not feasibly run the affairs of the inanimate entity unless certain powers could be delegated to officers and agents. The early case of Hoyt v. Thompson's Executor illustrates the judicial recognition of delegated powers. The charter authorized all business of ordinary nature to be transacted by a board of directors of twenty-three.


Soviet Government Corporations, John N. Hazard Apr 1943

Soviet Government Corporations, John N. Hazard

Michigan Law Review

Public ownership of the means of production is a basic principle of Soviet economy. Private ownership of property is now limited to ownership of consumer's goods, and private trading is confined to the narrowest areas and subjected to such rigid control that it has been reduced to the limitations of street peddling.

With the emphasis on public ownership, the management, protection and development of property belonging to the state has become a major activity of the Soviet government. Production, distribution and consumption of property are aspects of this activity.

Development of a mechanism of management has occupied Soviet jurists and …


Taxation-Capital Stock Tax-What Constitutes "Doing Business", James E. Dunlap Apr 1943

Taxation-Capital Stock Tax-What Constitutes "Doing Business", James E. Dunlap

Michigan Law Review

The capital stock tax is an excise tax levied not on the business itself but on the exercise of the privilege of doing business in a corporate capacity; hence the determination of tax liability involves a decision in each case as to whether the corporation is carrying on or doing business within the meaning of the tax statutes.


Corporations - Foreign Corporations - Effect Of Complying With Domestication Statute, E. George Rudolph Apr 1943

Corporations - Foreign Corporations - Effect Of Complying With Domestication Statute, E. George Rudolph

Michigan Law Review

Decedent was a resident of Nebraska and all his property was located there. By his will he left the residue of his estate to a number of charitable institutions including the Topeka Branch of the Women's Foreign Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church, a corporation incorporated in Kansas. The Topeka Branch claimed exemption from the Nebraska inheritance tax because it was a domestic charitable corporation, having complied with the Nebraska statute providing, "Any corporation organized under the laws of any other state . . . which has filed . . . with the secretary of state of this state, …


Deeds - Effect Of Noncompliance With Statute Requiring Grantor To Set Forth In Deed Name Under Which He Derived Title, Mary Jane Morris Apr 1943

Deeds - Effect Of Noncompliance With Statute Requiring Grantor To Set Forth In Deed Name Under Which He Derived Title, Mary Jane Morris

Michigan Law Review

In a suit between plaintiff and defendant Girola Bros., plaintiff obtained a judgment and levied upon certain property. Plaintiff purchased the land at an execution sale and recorded the sheriff's deed conveying the property to him. Prior to the commencement of the action, defendant Girola Bros. had changed its name to Madalay, Inc., and under the latter name had conveyed the property, subsequently levied on by plaintiff, to defendant M. Girola, pending the action by plaintiff. This deed was recorded. It set forth Madalay, Inc., as grantor, but failed to set forth the name in which Madalay, Inc., derived title …


Joint Adventure-Actions At Law For Share Of Profits, Hobart Taylor, Jr. Apr 1943

Joint Adventure-Actions At Law For Share Of Profits, Hobart Taylor, Jr.

Michigan Law Review

Action in assumpsit for money due under a contract whereby defendant leased plaintiff's entire clothing factory for the manufacture of 20,000 coats for which defendant held a government contract. By the terms of the agreement, plaintiff was to receive one-half of the net profits. The agreement expressly stated that they were not to be partners. The coats were manufactured pursuant to the agreement. Held, a mere agreement to share profits is, between the parties, insufficient to create a partnership, and assumpsit may be maintained by the members of a joint adventure inter sese for the agreed share of profits. …


Corporations - Dissolution At Suit Of A Minority Stockholder, E. George Rudolph Feb 1943

Corporations - Dissolution At Suit Of A Minority Stockholder, E. George Rudolph

Michigan Law Review

The general statement has often been made that a court of equity has no power to dissolve a solvent corporation at the suit of a minority stockholder, in the absence of special statutory authority. However, some of the cases which seem to support this rule hedge considerably by saying that "ordinarily" or "generally" equity has no such jurisdiction. These cases would seem little different than those which hold that a court of equity has inherent jurisdiction to dissolve a corporation but will exercise it only in cases of extreme necessity. The latter seems to be the prevailing view and on …


Taxation - Federal Income Tax - Capital Gain On Sale Of Partnership Interest, Herbert Sott Feb 1943

Taxation - Federal Income Tax - Capital Gain On Sale Of Partnership Interest, Herbert Sott

Michigan Law Review

In 1936, a taxpayer sold his interest in a partnership the assets of which were mainly acquired subsequent to his entering the partnership in 1932. The government contended that the taxpayer acquired and disposed of an interest in specific partnership assets and that the period for determining the capital gains percentages was properly measured from the date of acquisition of the specific capital assets. In his suit for refund on part of the tax thus computed, the taxpayer claimed that the partnership was a separate juristic entity, that his interest therein was an intangible capital asset, and that the period …