Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Amendments (1)
- Colorado courts (1)
- Constructive notice (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Corporate officers (1)
-
- Corporations (1)
- Delaware Court of Chancery (1)
- Delaware Supreme Court (1)
- Directors (1)
- Doctrine of apparent authority (1)
- Downsizing (1)
- Duty of oversight (1)
- Entrepreneurs (1)
- Fiduciaries (1)
- Graham v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. (1)
- Holland v. American Founders Life Insurance Co. (1)
- In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation (1)
- Income tax restrictions (1)
- Partners (1)
- Partnership (1)
- Paternalism (1)
- Pension and profit-sharing (1)
- Pre-retirement (1)
- Qualified retirement plans (1)
- RUPA (1)
- Red flag test (1)
- Revised Uniform Partnership Act (1)
- Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Tapping Rainy Day Funds For The Reluctant Entrepreneur: Downsizing, Paternalism, And The Internal Revenue Code, Edward J. Gac, Wayne M. Gazur
Tapping Rainy Day Funds For The Reluctant Entrepreneur: Downsizing, Paternalism, And The Internal Revenue Code, Edward J. Gac, Wayne M. Gazur
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Corporate Director's Duty Of Oversight, Mark J. Loewenstein
The Corporate Director's Duty Of Oversight, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
No abstract provided.
Notice And Notification Under The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: Some Suggested Changes, J. Dennis Hynes
Notice And Notification Under The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: Some Suggested Changes, J. Dennis Hynes
Publications
This Article addresses the decision by the drafters of the revised Uniform Partnership Act (1996) (RUPA) to reduce the traditional defenses available to partnerships in apparent authority cases. RUPA eliminated the requirement that apparent authority claims against a partnership be based on the claimant's reasonable expectations. Under RUPA a partnership is liable for a partner's unauthorized act even when the claimant had reason to know the act was unauthorized. A defense based on the claimant's knowledge is effective only when the claimant actually knows--is cognitively aware--that the act was unauthorized. This Article argues that this places an unfair burden on …