Law Commons^™

Avoidance Of An Unauthorized Post-Petition Transfer Of Intellectual Property Under Section 549 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Kathryn-Rose Russotto

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 549 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a trustee may avoid an unauthorized post-petition transfer of property of the debtor’s estate. Property is not limited to tangible property. Thus, a trustee can avoid a post-petition transfer of intangible assets, including intellectual property.

This article explores a trustee’s ability to avoid a post-petition transfer of intellectual property. Part I analyzes the legal standard for avoidance of unauthorized post-petition transfers under section 549. Part II examines section 549 in relation to intellectual property. Part III discusses the procedure for remedies a trustee can seek …

Sales Free And Clear Of An Intellectual Property Licensee's Interests In Bankruptcy -- Looking To In Re Tempnology For Guidance, Summer Chandler

Journal Articles

Uncertainty surrounds many issues that exist at the intersection of bankruptcy law and intellectual property law. Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code permits the debtor to sell assets free of a third party’s interest in such assets, provided one or more preconditions is satisfied. When a debtor rejects a license agreement pertaining to the debtor’s intellectual property, however, § 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code allows the licensee to choose to retain its rights to use the intellectual property that was the subject of the rejected license agreement. One unsettled question is whether a debtor may sell intellectual property pursuant to …

Trademarks Are “Intellectual Property” Under Bankruptcy Code Section 365(N), Emily Clark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) a trustee or a debtor-in-possession may reject an executory contract. Rejection has the same effect as a breach outside of bankruptcy; rejection does not rescind the rights that the contract previously granted or terminate the contract. Under section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code, a licensee of intellectual property may retain the right to use such intellectual property notwithstanding the rejection of such license provided it is an executory contract. A contract is executory when there is performance due, to some extent, from both parties. A …

Effects Of Licensors’ Duty To Maintain Control Over A Trademark On Licensees’ Ability To Assert Rights Provided Under Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Arianna Clark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor may reject or assume an executory contract, including a license for intellectual property. The definition of intellectual property does not include the term “trademark.” Consequently, it is not clear whether a non-debtor licensee can continue using a trademark if the debtor-licensor rejects it. Moreover, there appears to be a consensus forming among courts in that a debtor-licensee cannot assign a license to a third-party without the consent of the licensor. Regardless of which party initiates bankruptcy proceedings, there is a special consideration contemplated by courts– the …

Who Gets Paid? Section 365(N) Royalty Payments Under "Zombie Licenses" After A Sale Of Ip, Christopher G. Bradley

Law Faculty Popular Media

This short article discusses the Bankruptcy Code's unusual treatment of certain intellectual property licenses. First, it gives a brief overview of § 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. It then provides a short analysis of a difficult but important question: If a licensee of a debtor’s intellectual property opts to retain its license rights under § 365(n), who should receive the stream of licensing payments in the event that the IP is sold: the buyer of the IP, or the debtor in bankruptcy? The answer that has emerged in some of the case law is somewhat surprising -- after providing nuanced …

Debtors Beware: The Expanding Universe Of Non-Assumable/Non-Assignable Contracts In Bankruptcy, Michelle M. Harner, Carl E. Black, Eric R. Goodman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Bankrupting Trademarks, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

Articles

The explosive growth of technology in the last two decades has vastly expanded intellectual property jurisprudence and elevated intellectual property to a heightened status in the marketplace. Indeed, a company's intellectual property assets may now be its most valuable corporate assets. Moreover, the property value of some trademarks is significantly greater than that of the trademark owner's physical assets.

The term “intellectual property” is commonly understood to include patents, trade secrets, copyrights, and trademarks. Yet a paradigm has been constructed and enforced over the last fifteen years wherein only patents, trade secrets, and copyrights are included. The paradigm specifically excludes …

The Effect Of Bankruptcy Upon A Firm Using Patents And Trademarks As Collateral, Lois R. Lupica

Faculty Publications

The Bankruptcy Code sets forth an orderly process for the distribution of a debtor-in-bankruptcy's assets. This process has the effect of altering many of the procedural and substantive rights and obligations of the debtor, as well as of the debtor's creditors. Parties asserting a property interest in assets of a debtor in bankruptcy, however, must rely on nonbankruptcy law to determine the nature and extent of their property interests. The most commonly asserted interest by creditors involved in a bankruptcy are security interests.

Licensing Intellectual Property And Technology From The Financially-Troubled Or Startup Company: Prebankruptcy Strategies To Minimize The Risk In A Licensee's Intellectual Property And Technology Investment, Richard M. Cieri, Michelle M. Harner

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Use Of Intellectual Property As Collateral: Gap In The Perfection Of A Security Interest, Sofia Benammar

LLM Theses and Essays

The purpose of the present thesis is to let French lawyers know which step they need to take in order to best assist their client in securing a more solid investment. Lenders want to be protected. Lenders want to be sure that they can use the intellectual property rights in a commercial environment free from superior claims by third parties. In other words, a lender who provides a large loan to a borrower wants to know how and where its security interest will be perfected and what is the best way for him to have priority over other claims. This …