Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Bankruptcy Law

Michigan Law Review

Liability

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Bankruptcy--Bank Paying Depositor's Check After His Adjudication In Bankruptcy Is Liable To Trustee For Amount Of Check--Bank Of Marin V. England, Michigan Law Review Jan 1966

Bankruptcy--Bank Paying Depositor's Check After His Adjudication In Bankruptcy Is Liable To Trustee For Amount Of Check--Bank Of Marin V. England, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Prior to filing a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, which is an automatic adjudication of bankruptcy, depositor delivered five checks to Eureka Fisheries drawn upon depositor's account in appellant Bank of Marin. Six days after the filing, Eureka Fisheries presented the checks to appellant and received payment. Appellee, depositor's trustee in bankruptcy, did not notify appellant of the bankruptcy proceedings until after appellant had honored the checks. An order was sought by appellee from the referee in bankruptcy requiring appellant, or in the alternative Eureka Fisheries, to return the amount of the honored checks to the bankrupt's estate. The referee issued …


Corporations - Promotion - Discharge Of Promoter's Liability As Bidder At A Bankruptcy Sale, John Morrow Mar 1957

Corporations - Promotion - Discharge Of Promoter's Liability As Bidder At A Bankruptcy Sale, John Morrow

Michigan Law Review

On October 1, defendant made the high bid at a bankruptcy sale of hotel properties as "Mr. Ash, trustee." Later that same day a certificate of incorporation was executed for a corporation with Ash as treasurer. On October 4 the proper corporate papers were filed with the secretary of state. On October 4 the receivers receipted for the earnest money deposit, the instrument acknowledging, as interpreted by the court, that the receivers would look to the corporation to complete the contract and would not look to Mr. Ash personally. On October 14, the referee confirmed the sale to "Mr. Ash, …


Torts - Negligent Misrepresentations - Information Gratuitously Supplied, Michigan Law Review May 1938

Torts - Negligent Misrepresentations - Information Gratuitously Supplied, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiffs, who were liquidating trustees of a building and loan association, alleged that the association requested defendant to send it a copy of a certain will, but that defendant, who was trustee under the will, sent the association a copy of another will. Since the testators bore the same name, the association did not realize the error, but relied on the copy and suffered a loss which it would not have suffered if it had known the true state of facts. Plaintiffs sued to recover the loss. Held, plaintiffs have not stated a cause of action, inasmuch as they …


Corporations - Obligation To Refund Dividends Paid Out Of Capital May 1932

Corporations - Obligation To Refund Dividends Paid Out Of Capital

Michigan Law Review

The general rule is fairly well established that, where dividends are paid, in whole or in part, out of the capital stock, corporate creditors, being such when the dividend was declared, or becoming such at any subsequent time, may, to the extent of their claims, if such claims are not otherwise paid, compel the stockholders to whom the dividend has been paid to refund whatever portion of the dividend was taken out of the capital stock. This, however, has been modified in the federal courts to the extent that where the dividend, although paid entirely out of capital, was received …


Bankruptcy - Claims Against Bankrupt Indorsers Feb 1932

Bankruptcy - Claims Against Bankrupt Indorsers

Michigan Law Review

Bankrupts were indorsers of promissory notes payable to claimants. None of these notes was due before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy and some of them did not mature within the year following adjudication during which proof of claims may be made. The court of appeals for the sixth circuit held that claimants could not prove on the indorsements because their claims were contingent. Held, that the claim was one "founded upon a contract express or implied," and provable even though not due until after the year allowed for proof of claims, the requirement of presentment and notice …