Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in Law

Corporations - Liabilites - Inadequate Capitalization As Ground For Disregarding Corporate Entity, Lewis L. Clum Dec 1957

Corporations - Liabilites - Inadequate Capitalization As Ground For Disregarding Corporate Entity, Lewis L. Clum

Michigan Law Review

Defendant Resnick, meeting minimum statutory incorporation requirements, organized a corporation and thereafter persuaded defendants Cowan to join him in operating a used car enterprise under the corporate name. No stock was issued, nor capital paid in, although a checking account was opened for use by the business. Car purchases were financed through loans made or guaranteed by the elder Cowan, who held title until resale. Proceeds from resale transactions were deposited in the checking account, from which defendant Resnick reimbursed Cowan for money advanced. Sales volume averaged from $100,000 to $150,000 monthly. Assured that the elder Cowan was "backing" the …


Creditor's Rights - Garnisment -Garnishment Of Branch Banks, Thomas S. Erickson S.Ed. Nov 1957

Creditor's Rights - Garnisment -Garnishment Of Branch Banks, Thomas S. Erickson S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Under traditional legal analysis, branch banks are regarded as mere agencies of the banking corporation. Service of process on their officers binds the corporate principal. With the principal thus having knowledge, ". . . that knowledge or notice communicated to the principal, which imposes a duty upon it, becomes by that circumstance, the knowledge of all its agents when acting in an official capacity." Garnishment at a branch bank would therefore seem to impose upon the bank corporation the duty of impounding funds of the principal debtor regardless of the particular branch in which they were located. If funds of …


Corporations - Liquidation Upon Deadlock In Closely-Held Corporation - Interpretion Of Wisconsin Statute, Strong V. Fromm Laboratories,, Paul Komives May 1957

Corporations - Liquidation Upon Deadlock In Closely-Held Corporation - Interpretion Of Wisconsin Statute, Strong V. Fromm Laboratories,, Paul Komives

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, as trustee of an estate, held fifty percent of the shares of a going corporation. An election to fill all four positions on the corporation's board of directors was held. Since a by-law required that directors be shareholders, plaintiff was the only member of his own faction for whom he could vote. The opposing faction, holding the remaining fifty percent of the shares, had four eligible candidates. Votes for each of the four were cast, with one receiving one vote less than the other three. Plaintiff voted all of his shares for himself and also cast a vote of …


Creditor's Rights - Fraudulent Conveyances - Security Assignment Of Contract Payments Void If Assignor Retains Control, John A. Beach S.Ed. Apr 1957

Creditor's Rights - Fraudulent Conveyances - Security Assignment Of Contract Payments Void If Assignor Retains Control, John A. Beach S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

An insolvent debtor, who owed some $3,500 on plaintiff's partially-collected judgment, executed an instrument assigning to another creditor, a bank, all moneys due and to become due to the debtor under an existing contract, expressly as security for payment of the debtor's present and future indebtedness to the bank. The contract obligor was notified of the assignment, and thereafter the bank collected the amounts periodically accruing under the contract. The bank applied part of these collected amounts to the balance that the debtor owed the bank. The rest was either handed over to the debtor or credited to his general …


Taxation - Income Tax - Accurabilty Of Dealer Reserves Withheld By Finance Company, A. Duncan Whitaker S.Ed. Mar 1957

Taxation - Income Tax - Accurabilty Of Dealer Reserves Withheld By Finance Company, A. Duncan Whitaker S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Petitioner, a dealer in new and used trailers, had agreements with several finance companies whereby they agreed to buy promissory notes he received on installment sales. The agreements permitted the finance company to withhold a portion of the unpaid balance on each note and credit such amount to the petitioner's "dealer reserve" account. The petitioner was liable for all notes in default and the finance company could charge the reserve with any unpaid balance. The reserve could also be charged with any debts of the petitioner to the company. Periodically, the dealer was to receive portions of the reserve in …