Law Commons^™

Antitrust Problems In International Technology Transfers—United States V. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 648 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 2981), Christina Marie Ager

Washington Law Review

In 1970 the Department of Justice brought an antitrust action against Westinghouse Electric Corporation and two Japanese corporations, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (MELCO) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. (MHI) (together Mitsubishi). The government alleged violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act. Since 1923 the defendants or their predecessors had a series of technology-sharing agreements under which Westinghouse granted licenses of its Japanese patents to Mitsubishi. It excluded its counterpart patents in the United States and Canada from the agreements. The government contended that Mitsubishi had become so dependent on Westinghouse technology because of the technology-sharing agreements that it could not …

Standards For The Application Of United States Antitrust Law In An International Environment, William F. Baxter

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court And Antitrust Law: Remarks On Judicial Restraint In The Context Of Antitrust And Constitutional Law, Rex E. Lee

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

State Action Antitrust Immunity-A Doctrine In Search Of Definition, James C. Burling, William F. Lee, James L. Quarles Iii

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ebb And Flow Of Antitrust Enforcement: The Reagan And Carter Administrations, Sanford M. Litvack

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Tying Arrangements-An Update, Marcus Mattson

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Antitrust Laws And The Rights Of The Patentees: A Defense Of Limited Compulsory Licensing, Brian W. Peckham

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Commercial Treaties And Foreign Companies: The Mutually Reinforcing Principles Of Remedial Antitrust And National Treatment, Alan Van Kampen

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Note argues that greater appreciation for the nature and importance of national treatment obligations will compel tribunals fashioning antitrust relief to provide more suitably for foreign firms, and thus avoid straining international trade relations. Moreover, because antitrust relief and national treatment objectives are mutually reinforcing, greater recognition of national treatment requirements should improve remedial orders from the standpoint of antitrust economics. Meeting national treatment requirements should place little added burden on the antitrust tribunal; it must merely extend impartial economic analysis to all market suppliers, not just domestic firms.

This Note explores methods to ensure that antitrust relief orders …

Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association. V. Abbott Laboratories, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Baseball's Third Strike: The Triumph Of Collective Bargaining In Professional Baseball, Robert A. Mccormick

Vanderbilt Law Review

Since the inception of professional baseball, team owners have imposed limits on the freedom of players to negotiate contract terms. In this article Professor McCormick traces the history of attempts by professional baseball players to obtain contractual freedoms through the use of the antitrust and labor relations laws, attempts that culminated with the players' strike of 1981. Although players in other team sports successfully have utilized antitrust laws to increase player bargaining power, Professor McCormick argues that labor law has provided baseball players the only effective means to gain increased contractual freedoms. Professor McCormick concludes that player-owner disputes over the …

Wealth Transfers As The Original And Primary Concern Of Antitrust: The Efficiency Interpretation Challenged, Robert H. Lande

All Faculty Scholarship

Chicago School antitrust policy rests upon the premise that the sole purpose of antitrust is to promote economic efficiency. This article shows that this foundation is flawed. The fundamental purpose of antitrust is to protect consumers. To protect purchasers from paying supracompetitive prices when they buy goods or services. This is the "wealth transfer," "theft", "consumer welfare" or "purchaser protection" explanation for antitrust.

The article shows that the efficiency view originated in a detailed analysis of the legislative history of the Sherman Act undertaken by Robert Bork. Bork purported to show that Congress only cared about enhancing economic efficiency.

To …

Mobility Factors In Antitrust Cases: Assessing Market Power In Light Of Conditions Affecting Entry And Fringe Expansion, William H. Wentz

Michigan Law Review

To assist courts and litigants in developing and utilizing information on mobility factors in a meaningful manner, I have attempted in this Article to outline a basic approach for analyzing the competitive and efficiency significance of mobility factors in a litigative context. In Part I, I lay the necessary foundation: discussing the importance of mobility factors in accepted economic theory, explaining the sources of the current confusion and controversy about "entry barriers" and deriving from the debate areas of fundamental agreement among economists. Building on this common ground, I develop in Part II a basic approach to consideration of mobility …

Antitrust And Health Care—Psychologists Entitled To Blue Shield Reimbursement—Virginia Academy Of Clinical Psychologists V. Blue Shield Of Virginia, 624 F.2d 476 (4th Cir. 1980), Cert. Denied 450 U.S. 916 (1981), Donna M. Moniz

Washington Law Review

In Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Blue Shield of Virginia, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that Blue Shield violated section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act because Blue Shield refused to pay psychologists who did not bill through physicians. The court held that Blue Shield constituted a conspiracy of individual physicians acting to reduce competition in the delivery of psychotherapeutic services. This holding significantly enhances the ability of psychologists and other licensed health care providers to compete with physicians. This Note discusses Virginia Academy in light of the pertinent antitrust doctrines. It approves the Fourth Circuit's holding …

Intracorporate Plurality In Criminal Conspiracy Law, Sarah N. Welling

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The concept of conspiracy currently plays a significant role in three areas of substantive law: antitrust, civil rights, and criminal law. Although the role of conspiracy in these substantive areas of law differs in many ways, all three require that the conspiracy consist of a plurality of actors. Determining what constitutes a plurality of actors when all the alleged conspirators are agents of a single corporation poses a continuing problem.

This problem raises two distinct questions. The first is whether, when one agent acts alone within the scope of corporate business, the agent and the corporation constitute a plurality. The …

Municipalities And The Antitrust Laws: Home Rule Authority Is Insufficient To Ensure State Action Immunity, David J. White

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Recent Development first considers the evolution of the Parker doctrine in a variety of contexts-with special attention to the Supreme Court's decision in Lafayette and the Court's rationale in Boulder. After discussing the recent lower federal court decisions that based the availability of the Parker exemption upon the existence of general home rule authority under the respective state's constitution, this Recent Development examines the problems posed by the Boulder decision for cities and states contemplating economic regulation tailored to particular local concerns. This Recent Development then analyzes the competing policy interests in the question of a home rule municipality's …

Antitrust Suits By Targets Of Tender Offers, Frank H. Easterbrook, Daniel R. Fischel

Michigan Law Review

We explore in this Article the basis and consequences of the target's suit under the antitrust laws. We approach the question from the perspective of federal antitrust law and state corporation law.

We argue in Part I that the target is a singularly poor "private attorney general" because it is a beneficiary, not a victim, of any violation. An antitrust suit thus must be understood as an attempt by managers to defend their own positions, not as an attempt to vindicate the public interest. In the jargon of antitrust, the target is not a victim of "antitrust injury" and therefore …

Resale Price Maintenance And The Ftc: The Magnavox Investigation, Victor P. Goldberg

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Oligopoly, Shared Monopoly, And Antitrust Law, George A. Hay

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Government Supports United States Exporters, Jon H. Sylvester, Anthony F. Essaye

Publications

The latest addition to the US law of international trade, the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (the Act), was passed by Congress with a claim that it will put US exporters on more competitive footing with their foreign counterparts.

Extraterritorial Impact Of The United States Antitrust And Commercial Bribery Considerations, James G. Park

Penn State International Law Review

Historically, the United States has sought to impose its moralistic values extraterritorially. Our antitrust laws and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act are two well-known examples. Thus, in making the determination to engage in investment in the United States, a foreign entity must consider not only the more publicized restrictions of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act on its activity within the borders of this country, but also be concerned with the extraterritorial impact of the United States' antitrust laws and the extent to which the decision to invest in the United States may create exposire under United States antitrust …

Antitrust Consideration In Making Investment In The United States, Thomas L. Vankirk

Penn State International Law Review

The antitrust laws of the United States have taken on an increasingly significant role with regard to acquisitions and investments generally, and must be taken into consideration by a foreign investor interested in making foreign investments in the United States. Where the requisite contracts exist to establish subject matter jurisdiction, the antitrust laws of the United States will be applied to all proscribed acts regardless of the nationality of the participants. It is clear that most foreign investment in the United States constitutes the requisite minimum contacts required for jurisdiction.

There are two primary antitrust areas which should be addressed …

Foreign Statutory Response To Extraterritorial Application Of U.S. Antitrust Laws, John Cannon Iii

Penn State International Law Review

This comment will outline the international response to extraterritorial application of United States antitrust law, focusing primarily on foreign statutory enactments. Following a brief review of United States antitrust legislation, American case law will be analyzed. The next section of the inquiry will consist of an examination of the so-called "blocking statutes" of eight major United States trading partners. Finally, alternative solutions to the conflict will be outlined.

Anticompetitive Practices In Great Britain: Expanded Enforcement Under The Competition Act 1980, Carol B. Swanson

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The current antitrust laws are scattered among numerous statutory provisions. The British approach to antitrust laws is expressed in separate attacks on restrictive practices as opposed to broad attacks on monopolies and mergers. Restrictive agreements are controlled through a public registration process and reviewed by a specially-created court. Resale price maintenance is banned through similar procedures. Monopolies and mergers are investigated differently, with entire market sectors referred to a commission especially designed to determine whether a monopoly or merger operates against the public interest. This overall statutory structure is both too narrow, and too broad. It is too limited because …

Books Received, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

International Regulation of Internal Resources By Mahnoush H. Arsanjani Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia,1981. Pp. 558. $37.50.

ANTITRUST AND AMERICAN BUSINESS ABROAD By James R. Atwood and Kingman Brewster, 2nd ed. Colorado Springs: Shepard's/Mc-Graw-Hill, 1981. Pp. 359 and 355.

FAMILY VIOLENCE: AN INTERNATIONAL AND INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY By John M. Eekelar and Sanford N. Katz Toronto: Butterworth's, 1978. Pp. 572.

THE ARAB STATES AND THE PALESTINE CONFLICT By Barry Rubin Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981. Pp. 298. $22.00.

THE KURDISH QUESTION IN IRAQ By Edmund Ghareeb Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981. Pp. 223. $22.00.

THE CAMBRIDGE LECTURES Edited by Derek Mendes …

The Immunity Of Local Governments And Their Officials From Antitrust Claims After City Of Boulder, J. Robert Brame Iii, Howard Feller

University of Richmond Law Review

On January 13, 1982, the United States Supreme Court rendered an opinion against the City of Boulder, Colorado, which expanded the potential liability of local governmental entities and their officials to claims under the federal antitrust laws. The Supreme Court essentially held that a municipality cannot obtain immunity from antitrust claims unless it satisfies a stringent test. Due to the broad language of the opinion, virtually every activity in which a local governmental entity engages, including the traditional activities of zoning, licensing, franchising, purchasing and operating public utilities, has become subject to antitrust challenges that may require a trial on …

The Impact Of United States Antitrust Law On The Balance Of Trade, David N. Goldsweig, Kenneth D. Enborg, Thomas F. Walton

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article explores the underlying propositions that the United States antitrust agencies have created a barrier to the export of United States industrial goods or have impeded their domestic manufacture with respect to this nation's major trading partners. We conclude that neither proposition is well supported by solid evidence, although improved cooperation among Government and business and a less litigious climate are desirable in this area as well as all other industry-government relations." This Article first considers the impact of antitrust enforcement on the export or overseas distribution stage of United States domestic producers and then turns to the effect …

The At&T Agreement: Reorganization Of The Telecommunications Industry And Conflicts With Illinois Law, 15 J. Marshall L. Rev. 563 (1982), Frederic D. Tennenbaum, Michael P. Hurst

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Symposium Introduction, Terry Calvani

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Symposium issue of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law presents a collection of excellent articles on current antitrust law and United States international trade practices by some of the most knowledgeable scholars in the field, all of whom possess not only superb academic credentials but also a wealth of experience in international antitrust practice. Wilbur Fugate, former chief of the Foreign Commerce Section of the Antitrust Division and a distinguished author on antitrust and foreign commerce, opens the Symposium by examining the Webb-Pomerene Act" in light of the very recently enacted Export Trading Company Act of 1982...

The Symposium …

The Export Trade Exception To The Antitrust Laws: The Old Webb-Pomerene Act And The New Export Trading Company Act, Wilbur L. Fugate

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Article discusses the history of the Webb Act as a prelude to a discussion of the new legislation. Because the standards in the new Export Act are similar to those in the Webb Act, the precedents under the Webb Act will remain important for interpreting the new legislation. Furthermore, a review of the Webb Act and of the alternatives proposed over the years gives an insight into the reasoning behind having an export exception to the antitrust laws... This Article will examine the Webb Act and its operation; the courts' treatment of the Webb Act; the manifold suggestions and …

Book Review, Joel Davidow (Reviewer)

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Book Review

Antitrust and American Business Abroad James Atwood and Kingman Brewster 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 1981. Two-volume text. Pp. 359 and 355.

Reviewed by Joel Davidow

International antitrust is one of the gourmet specialties on the menu of United States law. The combination of competition law, international law, and patent law, spiced with complex diplomatic and trade issues as well as a dash of foreign flavor, is irresistible to the connoisseur. The proof: even though few law schools offer a separate course in international antitrust law and few lawyers deal with the subject regularly, articles, hornbooks, …