Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Advanced Health-Care Services v. Radford Community Hospital (1)
- Advanced Health-CareService v. Radford Community Hospital (1)
- Airport Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Capital Region Airport Commission (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Antitrust Amendments Act (1)
-
- Associated Press v. United States (1)
- Bolt v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center (1)
- Books Received (1)
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat (1)
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp (1)
- City Gas Co. of Florida v. Consolidated Gas of Florida (1)
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising (1)
- Clayton Act (1)
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp (1)
- Eden Hannon & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co (1)
- Foreword (1)
- Hampton Audio Electronics Inc. v. Contel Cellular (1)
- History (1)
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital (1)
- Index (1)
- Jeffress v. Titius (1)
- Jefiress v. Titius (1)
- Klors Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores (1)
- Laurel Sand & Gravel Inc. v. CSX Transporation (1)
- Laurel Sand & Gravel Inc. v. CSX Transportation (1)
- McLain v. Real Estate Board (1)
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp (1)
- Northwest Wholesale Stationers Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co. (1)
- Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital (1)
- Oltz v. St. Peter's Community Hospital (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Antitrust And Trade Regulation, Michael F. Urbanski
University of Richmond Law Review
Virginia federal courts have shown a reluctance this past year to summarily dismiss plaintiffs' antitrust claims on Rule 12(b)(6) motions where there is no factual record. However, once a sufficient record has been established, the courts have continued their rigorous scrutiny of antitrust claims. While this year's decisions contain few victories for antitrust plaintiffs on the merits, surprisingly, their holdings are mixed and cannot be categorized as decidedly pro-plaintiff or defendant. This past year, the Fourth Circuit has limited plaintiffs' actions by broadening the sweep of the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine established in Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. to include …